eco TV

United States, president Biden’s major works


What are the main priorities of president Biden’s investment programme?  How will it be financed?

TRANSCRIPT // United States, president Biden’s major works : May 2021



François Doux: 2.3 trillion dollars, the equivalent of 10 points of US GDP. That is the size of President Biden’s proposed infrastructure plan. Spread over eight years, the plan will probably be financed through higher taxes. We are here with Jean-Luc Proutat to tell us more on this recovery plan. Hello Jean-Luc.

Jean-Luc Proutat: Hello François.

François Doux: Before diving into the details of this stimulus package, can you describe the US economic environment in spring 2021. How do things look?

Jean-Luc Proutat: The economy is very vibrant. For someone nicknamed “Sleepy Joe” by his predecessor, President Biden has hit the ground running as summer 2021 approaches and he completes his first 100 days in office. The 1.9 trillion dollar American Rescue Plan was approved in March, and it has already begun to have an impact on the economy just as the pandemic begins to ease. Now that nearly 50% of the population has been vaccinated, Americans are circulating more freely, with more money in their pockets, thanks to the stimulus checks many have recently received from the US Treasury. Households are also benefiting from tax credits. All of this has given consumption a big lift in the US, and full-year growth is estimated at 6% at the least. That said, President Biden will not settle for simply stepping on the gas to rev the engines. He also intends to strengthen and consolidate America’s economic growth engine. 

François Doux: Let’s talk more about this famous recovery plan to modernise the US economy. What all is in the plan? And do you think it will be effective?

Jean-Luc Proutat: This plan begins with the rather paradoxical observation that even though the US is one of the world’s wealthiest nations, it does not invest much in infrastructure.

The US does not score very highly on the OECD rankings on infrastructure or the energy transition, which is also advancing rather slowly. The infrastructure plan focuses on these two objectives: to strengthen and renovate infrastructure, notably for transport and utilities, such as water and electricity; and to promote green energy, including higher taxes on fossil fuels. Virtually two-thirds of the plan are devoted to these two areas. This leaves a non negligible part of the plan that is steeped in economic patriotism. It consists of promoting America’s strategic interests and to invest in America in areas where it is losing ground to Asia, and China in particular. A lot of money has been pledged to support supply chains for such things as semiconductors, batteries, wind turbines and active drug ingredients. And when it comes to their feasibility, the Federal government must absolutely count on the support of the local authorities, because the United States is built on a Federal system in which the power over infrastructure lies in the hands of the state, municipal and county governments. Their cooperation is vital if the plan is to succeed. Whereas the 1.9 trillion dollar American Rescue Plan was financed through debt and deficits, this time taking on more debt is out of the question. Instead, the plan relies on the contribution of companies, who should also benefit from the infrastructure programme.

François Doux: Getting companies to pay their fair share is the famous tax proposal of this stimulus plan. It will be hard to get companies to swallow this part of the plan.

Jean-Luc Proutat: That’s right. The plan starts with the observation that the corporate tax revenues have fallen considerably over the past ten years, especially after Donald Trump’s 2018 tax reform. The tax burden needs to be shared better. Several measures come to mind. The biggest is the proposed increase in the corporate tax rate to 28% from 21%. There is also the application of a 21% minimum tax rate on corporate earnings generated abroad. Of course, these measures mainly concern major corporations. The first that come to mind are the Big Tech companies, who will be hit hardest by this fiscal tightening. The reform is currently being debated in the US Senate. It will have to win unanimous support from the Democrats, which is far from certain. President Biden has already said that he is open to compromise. We will see what that really means, but one thing is certain, we have probably reached the beginning of the end of “whatever it takes” in the United States.

François Doux: Jean-Luc Proutat, thank you for this detailed analysis of the US infrastructure plan. We are sure to talk more about all this. We will be back in a moment to talk about the impact of this plan on the economies of Central America with Salim Hammad and our Chart of the Month.

View more videos Eco TV

On the Same Theme

Federal Reserve: enhanced credibility 6/21/2021
More FOMC members than before are projecting a rate hike in 2022 and Jerome Powell made it clear during his press conference that tapering would happen when circumstances would justify this. Yet, 10 year Treasury yields, after an initial increase, ended up trading below the pre-FOMC meeting level. Break-even inflation also declined. Bond investors seem to share the view of the Fed that the current elevated inflation will be a transient phenomenon. This also explains the decline in the price of gold. The negative reaction of equity markets reflects an increase in the required risk premium and shows a certain unease about the impact of a less accommodative monetary policy on the growth outlook.
Inflation off track 6/14/2021
Our barometer this week shows a phenomenon that is attracting increasing comment in the US: a significant rise in inflation as the Covid-19 pandemic recedes. Some people, including the Chair of the Federal Reserve Jerome Powell, are playing down the increase, while others, such as former Treasury Secretary Lawrence Summers and economist Nouriel Roubini, see it as a possible paradigm shift.
US: back to the seventies? 5/12/2021
In the debate on economic policy in the US, some commentators warn we may be returning to the seventies. It was a period of major shocks – the move to floating exchange rates, two oil crises –, high and accelerating inflation and an increased role for government.
Which insights from the ‘great inflation’ of the 1970s? 5/10/2021
The ‘great inflation’ of the 1970s had many causes. The policy objective of full employment had already led to high inflation by the end of the 1960s. Two oil shocks and the depreciation of the dollar caused additional increases. The key factor was monetary policy, which was not adapted to the circumstances. It reflected the view that the Fed did not have a mandate to tolerate the sizeable increase in unemployment that might have ensued from the aggressive tightening needed to bring inflation under control. In addition, inflation was considered to be a cost-push phenomenon that could be addressed with wage and price controls. Today’s situation is very different. The Federal Reserve is an independent central bank and inflation expectations are well-anchored. However, letting the economy run hot is reminiscent of the 1960s. Should inflation be above target for too long, the Federal Reserve will need to have the courage to tighten policy sufficiently despite the potential cost to the economy.
US indicators: An accelerated pulse 5/10/2021
The vaccine keeps its promises, so does Joe Biden. With USD 400 bn in stimulus checks nearly in pockets and partial immunity achieved against Covid 19, Americans are on the move to spend again. After a record-breaking month of March, private consumption surged by more than 10% (seasonally adjusted annual rate, saar) in the first quarter. GDP rose 6.4% (saar) and will continue to accelerate in the weeks and months ahead.
The Biden infrastructure plan 5/4/2021
In the United States, there has been a series of “once-in-a-generation” recovery plans that have little in common. Unlike the USD 1.9 trillion “American Rescue Plan” adopted in March, the nearly USD 2.3 trillion “American Jobs Plan” proposed by President Biden is geared towards the long term and aims to be fully financed through taxes. Designed to defend America’s strategic interests, the plan’s philosophy is similar to the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009. Yet the Biden administration is not foregoing a multilateral framework: its plan is also intended to serve as a vehicle for international fiscal harmonisation. 
A rosy Beige Book 4/19/2021
It is a true pleasure to read the April 2021 edition of the Beige Book, which the Federal Reserve Board (Fed) publishes eight times a year on current economic conditions in the US. Without exception, all twelve districts covered by Fed surveys reported an improvement in the business climate, with the wealthiest and most productive regions of the northeast, like Philadelphia, bordering on euphoria.
As the epidemic wanes, the economy soars 4/9/2021
The US economy has taken off. Bolstered by the easing of the Covid-19 pandemic as much as by unprecedented fiscal support, GDP will soar by at least 6% in 2021, surpassing the pre-crisis level of 2019. Inflation will accelerate and temporarily overshoot the Federal Reserve’s 2% target. Nonetheless, the central bank will not deviate from its accommodating stance. The Fed’s top priority is  employment, which continues to bear the scars of the crisis and has a long way to go before making up for all of the lost ground. As a result, monetary conditions will remain accommodating, both for the economy and the markets, even at the risk of encouraging some excessive behaviour.
US banks: reactivation of the Fed’s Reverse Repo facility, a factor in reducing balance sheets 4/7/2021
On 17 March, the US Federal Reserve (Fed) raised the ceiling on transactions under its Reverse Repo Program (RRP). Each eligible counterparty* can now take, on each trading day, up to USD 80 billion in Treasuries held by the Fed on repo, from a limit of USD30 billion previously. Introduced in the autumn of 2013, one year before the ending of QE3 (the Fed’s third quantitative easing programme) and two years before the beginning of the post-crisis monetary tightening, this facility saw high levels of participation by money market funds (with interest rates of between 0.01% and 0.07% up to the end of 2015) and helped establish a floor for short-term market interest rates. Against a background of abundant central bank liquidity, the programme has the effect of reducing downward pressure on short-term rates by encouraging money market funds and GSEs to “lend“ part of their cash to the Fed rather than on markets (repo, Fed Funds) where demand has dried up. Although the reactivated RRP has not so far seen much uptake (the interest rate paid is zero), it could allow, over the coming weeks, a slimming down of bank balance sheets. The penalty that certain banks are preparing to introduce on deposits from institutional clients, in a bid to reduce their balance sheets, could push this cash towards money market funds and from there, via the reactivation of the RRP, to the Fed**. * 24 primary dealers, 16 banks, 15 Government-Sponsored Enterprises and 91 money market funds. ** In 2015 JP Morgan introduced a penalty on deposits that resulted in an outflow of around USD200 billion in non-operating deposits from its balance sheet and helped reduce the regulatory equity surcharge arising from its position as a global systemically important bank (G-SIB).
Does the American Rescue Plan go too far? 3/23/2021
Totalling USD 1.9 trillion or 9 percent of GDP, the American Rescue Plan ranks among the largest stimulus packages ever launched in the United States. The plan aims to overcome the Covid-19 pandemic, but does not stop there. The new supportive measures, combined with those approved in December 2020, could rapidly bring the US economy under pressure; Inflation is not the biggest threat, even though it is expected to rise above 2%. The surge in prices is likely to be short lived since global competition and the accelerating digital revolution are bound to have a moderating effect. Among the possible harmful effects is the risk of fuelling speculative behaviours in certain market segments (tech stocks, high-yield bonds…).  

ABOUT US Three teams of economists (OECD countries research, emerging economies and country risk, banking economics) make up BNP Paribas Economic Research Department.
This website presents their analyses.
The website contains 2732 articles and 723 videos