eco TV

EcoTV – May 2021


TRANSCRIPT // EcoTV – May 2021 : May 2021

François Doux: Hello and welcome to the May 2021 edition of EcoTV and our special on the Americas. Joe Biden has just completed his first one hundred days in office. In our Focus, Jean-Luc Proutat will talk with us about the President’s infrastructure plan. Spread over eight years and equivalent to nearly 10 points of US GDP, the vast stimulus plan will also have an impact on the neighbouring countries. In our Chart of the Month, Salim Hammad will talk about Central America and the transmission channels between economic conditions in the United States and the region’s economies. We will end the emission with Three Questions for William De Vijlder, who will look back on the 1970s to help put things in perspective. What lessons can be drawn from this period? We will talk more about all this at the end of the show.




François Doux: 2.3 trillion dollars, the equivalent of 10 points of US GDP. That is the size of President Biden’s proposed infrastructure plan. Spread over eight years, the plan will probably be financed through higher taxes. We are here with Jean-Luc Proutat to tell us more on this recovery plan. Hello Jean-Luc.

Jean-Luc Proutat: Hello François.

François Doux: Before diving into the details of this stimulus package, can you describe the US economic environment in spring 2021. How do things look?

Jean-Luc Proutat: The economy is very vibrant. For someone nicknamed “Sleepy Joe” by his predecessor, President Biden has hit the ground running as summer 2021 approaches and he completes his first 100 days in office. The 1.9 trillion dollar American Rescue Plan was approved in March, and it has already begun to have an impact on the economy just as the pandemic begins to ease. Now that nearly 50% of the population has been vaccinated, Americans are circulating more freely, with more money in their pockets, thanks to the stimulus checks many have recently received from the US Treasury. Households are also benefiting from tax credits. All of this has given consumption a big lift in the US, and full-year growth is estimated at 6% at the least. That said, President Biden will not settle for simply stepping on the gas to rev the engines. He also intends to strengthen and consolidate America’s economic growth engine. 

François Doux: Let’s talk more about this famous recovery plan to modernise the US economy. What all is in the plan? And do you think it will be effective?

Jean-Luc Proutat: This plan begins with the rather paradoxical observation that even though the US is one of the world’s wealthiest nations, it does not invest much in infrastructure.

The US does not score very highly on the OECD rankings on infrastructure or the energy transition, which is also advancing rather slowly. The infrastructure plan focuses on these two objectives: to strengthen and renovate infrastructure, notably for transport and utilities, such as water and electricity; and to promote green energy, including higher taxes on fossil fuels. Virtually two-thirds of the plan are devoted to these two areas. This leaves a non negligible part of the plan that is steeped in economic patriotism. It consists of promoting America’s strategic interests and to invest in America in areas where it is losing ground to Asia, and China in particular. A lot of money has been pledged to support supply chains for such things as semiconductors, batteries, wind turbines and active drug ingredients. And when it comes to their feasibility, the Federal government must absolutely count on the support of the local authorities, because the United States is built on a Federal system in which the power over infrastructure lies in the hands of the state, municipal and county governments. Their cooperation is vital if the plan is to succeed. Whereas the 1.9 trillion dollar American Rescue Plan was financed through debt and deficits, this time taking on more debt is out of the question. Instead, the plan relies on the contribution of companies, who should also benefit from the infrastructure programme.

François Doux: Getting companies to pay their fair share is the famous tax proposal of this stimulus plan. It will be hard to get companies to swallow this part of the plan.

Jean-Luc Proutat: That’s right. The plan starts with the observation that the corporate tax revenues have fallen considerably over the past ten years, especially after Donald Trump’s 2018 tax reform. The tax burden needs to be shared better. Several measures come to mind. The biggest is the proposed increase in the corporate tax rate to 28% from 21%. There is also the application of a 21% minimum tax rate on corporate earnings generated abroad. Of course, these measures mainly concern major corporations. The first that come to mind are the Big Tech companies, who will be hit hardest by this fiscal tightening. The reform is currently being debated in the US Senate. It will have to win unanimous support from the Democrats, which is far from certain. President Biden has already said that he is open to compromise. We will see what that really means, but one thing is certain, we have probably reached the beginning of the end of “whatever it takes” in the United States.

François Doux: Jean-Luc Proutat, thank you for this detailed analysis of the US infrastructure plan. We are sure to talk more about all this. We will be back in a moment to talk about the impact of this plan on the economies of Central America with Salim Hammad and our Chart of the Month.




François Doux: The US is not the only economy that will benefit from the country’s massive stimulus package. Neighbouring countries also stand to benefit. We are here with Salim Hammad to talk about Central America. Hello Salim.

Salim Hammad: Hello François.

François Doux: Can you tell us about the channels through which Central American economies stand to benefit from more dynamic economic conditions in the US.

Salim Hammad: There are mainly three transmission channels. The first is a trade channel, which operates via exports from the region to the United States. The second is a financial channel, which operates via investment flows from American entities to the region. And the last one, is a monetary channel, which refers to money transfers sent by migrant workers based in the United States. The chart illustrates the importance of these three transmission channels for each of the economies in the region. We can see in each case, the share that the United States’ represents in the country’s exports, foreign direct investment (FDI), and remittances, which are respectively captured by the green, red and orange bars. For the sake of simplicity, we can see that, on average, roughly 35% of the region’s exports are shipped to the United States. Also, about 1 out of 3 US dollars in foreign direct investment originatesfrom the US. Finally, we see, and this is probably the most striking feature of this chart, that on average about 80% of the remittances that flow back intothe region find their source in the United States. And the amounts being sent are substantial: for countries like Honduras or El Salvador, these transfers represent theequivalent of almost a quarter the size of their economy.  And we have already started to see the impact of a strong US recovery on such transfers. Point in case, remittances in Honduras, were up almost 30% year-on-year in the first quarter.

François Doux: Now let us talk diplomacy. Under the Trump administration, we saw three countries cut their diplomatic ties with Taiwan in order to operate a rapprochement with China. These included Panama, El Salvador and the Dominican Republic. With the Biden administration, what= can we expect in terms of US diplomatic behaviour towards Central America?

Salim Hammad: We expect to see a more active, less antagonistic   and more cooperative foreign policy from the Biden administration. This will likely translate into increased development aid which if you recall was cut during the Trump years.

President Biden has already revoked a number of measures from his predecessor, for instance by stopping the expulsion of unaccompanied children, a phenomenon which witnessed an upward trend in recent years. Above all, the Biden administration has just announced a 4 billion dollar plan to address the “push” factors that drive migration flows from the region to the United States. These are closely linked to issues of poverty, violence, and governance as well as environmental factors, given that many economies in the region are highly dependent on agriculture.

François Doux: Looking at their economic prospects, the horizon is rather favourable for these Central American economies. Of course, they have been shaken by the Covid crisis. Tell us about the risks these economies face in the months ahead. 


Salim Hammad: The main risk is social, with a cocktail of factors that are hardly favourable. Social tensions were rising ahead of the health crisis in certain countries. This is the case for Costa Rica with its public sector reforms, but also with the social demands in other countries, notably Guatemala and Panama. Then there is the rather violent political crisis in Nicaragua. On top of that, the country has very little fiscal manoeuvring room, unemployment is on the rise, especially among youth, and inequality and poverty are both getting worse. The IMF estimated recently that for many countries, per capita GDP would not return to pre-crisis, pre-pandemic levels before 2024. We must also add two aggravating factors to this list: the upturn in oil prices, since most of these countries are net hydrocarbon importers, and the risk of hurricanes and droughts, which are another source of these famous migrant caravans observed in recent years.

François Doux: Thank you, Salim Hammad, for this update on the economies of Central America. We will be back in a moment with Three Questions on the United States and a look back at the 1970s with William De Vijlder.




François Doux: In the late 1960s, the Beatles were singing “Back in the U.S.S.R.”. Today the refrain is more likely to be “Back to the seventies”. In Three Questions, we will talk with William De Vijlder about the 1970s and why they are back in the economic news. Hello William.

William De Vijlder: Hello François.

François Doux: First question: why this reference to the 70s?

William De Vijlder: The reference is inspired by recent opinion pieces, notably by the former US Treasury Secretary Larry Summers. They claim that the United States is now experiencing a paradigm shift in terms of economic policy. It has been the biggest change since Ronald Reagan and Paul Volcker were at the helm. At his inauguration in 1981, it is Ronald Reagan who said that “government is the problem.” Clearly, government was not going to be the solution, but today, the administration has taken a whole new direction with a series of initiatives launched by Joe Biden. Paul Volcker arrived at the end of the 1970s. He too made a fundamental change.

François Doux: Second question William De Vijlder. What was the problem in the 1970s? There was oil and inflation, there were even ideas.

William De Vijlder: Larry Summers’ comments implicitly referred to the major problem of the 1970s, not only in the United States but also in many other countries: runaway inflation that was impossible to control. Several factors were at play. First, by the end of the 1960s, the US economy was already beginning to overheat, which fuelled an upward trend in wage growth and inflation. Second, there were several major shocks. There were two oil price shocks, with more inflation in the economy, and an inappropriate monetary policy. It was clear that in the 1970s, before the arrival of Paul Volcker, the Fed chairman lacked the courage to tighten monetary policy because it was not really in keeping with the times.

François Doux: Third and last question. In 2021, what lessons can we learn from the 1970s? There is currently a lot of talk about inflation expectations.

William De Vijlder: What is feeding fears today is a whole range of factors pointing towards accelerating inflation. It can be seen in the latest surveys of business leaders.

Commodity prices have risen sharply, there is a shortage of semiconductors… Jerome Powell, chair of the Federal Reserve, said: “Yes, we see all that, it will be fleeting and temporary. What is very important is that inflation expectations have not risen. Thus we can continue to be relaxed about it”. This is an extremely important point. In a recent speech, he insisted strongly that the Federal Reserve had learnt the lessons of the 1970s. In other words, it had learnt the lessons of its monetary policy errors. If there were a bigger and more sustained increase in inflation, the Federal Reserve would not hesitate to act and to raise its key rates. This scenario must be monitored closely, notably by keeping an eye on inflationary expectations. One thing that is clear today is that financial markets are not expecting a severe monetary tightening.

François Doux: So we must monitor the statistics that foreshadow inflation, along with the Fed’s communications, of course. Thank you, William De Vijlder, for these Three Questions.

William De Vijlder: Thank you.

François Doux: Tune in again next month for a new edition of EcoTV.

View more videos Eco TV

On the Same Theme

United States: reallocation of bank portfolios towards the Eurozone since Brexit 11/24/2021
The US banking system’s exposure to the Eurozone has significantly increased since 2016, the year of the referendum in favour of the UK’s exit from the European Union. Between 31 March 2016 and 30 June 2021, claims of the eight biggest US banks1 on Eurozone2 residents (excluding the public sector) have grown by more (USD 125.6 billion) than claims on the UK economy have fallen (USD 56.3 billion). The main beneficiaries of this switch include France (up USD 66.3 billion, or +47%), Luxembourg (up USD36.5 billion, +97%), Ireland (USD 28.8 billion, +46%) and Germany (USD 5.8 billion, +7%). Most of this expansion has been concentrated at Goldman Sachs and JP Morgan. US banks’ cross-border exposure to the Eurozone (i.e. that held by legal entities established in the US) still outweighs the local exposure of their European subsidiaries and branches (89% vs 11%). Brexit has nevertheless been accompanied by a stepping up of their local activities. Local claims of major US banks in the Eurozone have increased threefold over the period (rising by USD 44.5 billion), to the detriment of the UK (down USD 58.8 billion, or -20%). Cross-border claims on the Eurozone grew more slowly at an aggregate level (+18%, against +4% for the UK). 1 The breakdown of foreign exposure for the US banking system taken as a whole is incomplete prior to Q3 2016. At 30 June 2021, the 8 major US banks (JP Morgan, Bank of America, Citigroup, Wells Fargo, Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley, Bank of New York Mellon, State Street) accounted for 74% of US exposure to the UK economy and 83% of US exposure to the Eurozone. 2 Foreign claims of a banking system include cross-border claims and local claims by foreign subsidiaries and branches in foreign or local currency. They exclude claims resulting from positions on derivative contracts, guarantees extended and credit commitments. Data is given here on an ultimate risk basis, that is to say allocated to the country where the final risk lies (country of residence of the guarantor of a loan and/or of the parent company of the borrower).  
Inflation rises above 6% 11/15/2021
The “transitory” surge in inflation is proving to be long lasting. In October, US inflation rose to 6.2% year-on-year, the highest level in 31 years. As in previous months, the main explanation is a ballooning energy bill (which accounts for 30% of this figure), but the acceleration in prices is spreading throughout the US economy. It can be seen in the cost of shelter, which is already up 3.5% year-on-year, and is surely bound to accelerate. 
Weaker US household confidence, a source of concern? 10/29/2021
A recent academic paper argues that, considering the significant recent decline of consumer expectations, the US could be entering recession. However, Covid-19 complicates the interpretation of household confidence data. Fluctuations in infections play a role and the recovery from last year’s recession as well as other factors have caused a jump in inflation. Given the historically high quits rate, the weakening in household sentiment probably reflects mounting concern about the impact of inflation on spending power. Something similar has been observed in the latest consumer confidence data for France.
United States: PPP government-guaranteed loans are largely converted into public subsidies 10/13/2021
In response to the Covid-19 pandemic, the US Congress set up the Paycheck Protection Program (PPP) in April 2020 to provide loans backed by the Federal government to small and medium-sized enterprises (SME). When subscriptions closed on 31 May 2021, about USD 800 bn in PPP loans had been issued. Banks originated 80% of these loans and non-banking lending companies and fintechs issued the remaining 20%. Several aspects of this programme differ from France’s state-backed loan programme (PGE), especially its fiscal cost. First, in the United States, the Federal government fully covers the credit risk associated with government-guaranteed loans1. Second, American lenders receive fees to compensate for the cost of originating PPP loans (between 1% and 5% depending on the principal amount). Based on the structure of PPP loans outstanding, the amount of fees paid was about USD 30 bn. Lastly, in the US, under certain conditions, the government-guaranteed loans can be converted into public subsidies to the corporate borrowers (limited to the amount of payroll costs, as well as utilities, mortgage and rent payments). For PPP loans to be partially or fully forgiven, the corporate beneficiary had to maintain jobs and wages during the 8 to 24 weeks after the loan was granted. At 10 October 2021, more than USD 575 bn in PPP loans outstanding had been forgiven (7.5 million loans), or 73% of the total amount outstanding (65% of the total number of loans granted)2. Under the extreme hypothesis that all of the PPP loans distributed under the programme were fully forgiven, the fiscal cost of the mechanism would amount to USD 835 bn3. 1 In France, the government assumes 70% to 80% of the credit risk for PGE to major corporations, and 90% for PGE to small and medium-sized enterprises. French banks cover the residual risk. 2 PPP forgiveness platform lender submission metrics reports ( 3 Covid Money Tracker
Damaging tardiness 10/11/2021
One of the shocking paradoxes of America, cradle of the miracle of vaccines against Covid-19, is that the country is still seeing daily death numbers in the thousands. The still-too-deadly wave of the epidemic over the summer may have contributed to the slowing of the recovery in employment.
Budget battles and monetary tightening 10/6/2021
On the whole, the US economy has recovered very quickly, albeit unequally, from the loss of business caused by the Covid-19 pandemic. Exceptional Federal transfers have fuelled a spectacular rebound in private consumption, so much so that it is nearly overheating. Faced with a global parts shortage and hiring troubles, companies are having a hard time meeting demand. Prices have come under pressure. For the US Federal Reserve, the time has come to begin withdrawing monetary support. The debt ceiling has just been hit, and major budget bills remain in suspense until an agreement to raise the limit can be reached with the Republicans.
Employment situation improves, but the Delta variant is creating doubt 9/6/2021
In his traditional monetary-policy speech to the annual Jackson Hole Economic Symposium, Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell expressed satisfaction with the latest US jobs market figures. He had good reason to do so: in the three months from June to August, the US economy created more than 2.2 million jobs (non-farm activities), including almost 800.000 in the resurgent tourism industry (hotels, restaurants, leisure etc.). Although the Covid-19 jobs deficit remains large (around 5.5 million) and although the unemployment rate is still too high by American standards (5.2%), the situation is gradually returning to normal.
Fed’s Powell brings reassurance 9/3/2021
Fed Chair Powell’s speech at the annual symposium at Jackson Hole organised by the Federal Reserve of Kansas City was eagerly awaited by financial markets, which were hoping that he would shed some light on the Fed’s intentions of scaling back its asset purchases.
United States: a new tool to reduce the pressure on money-market rates 9/1/2021
On 28 July, the US Federal Reserve (Fed) announced that it would establish a Standing Repo Facility (SRF). Each eligible counterparty* will now be able to borrow, every business day and on an overnight basis, up to USD 120 billion of central-bank liquidity as part of the SRF**. Operations will bear interest at the marginal lending facility rate (25bp) and be capped at USD 500 billion. The SRF gives the Fed a new tool for detecting possible central-bank money shortages. In September 2019, the system was introduced on an emergency basis and temporarily, and helped to ease the repo markets crisis. However, no such system existed ahead of the shock, when regulatory liquidity constraints, made worse by the reduction in the Fed’s balance sheet, prevented banks from responding to the demand for cash in the money markets. The possibility of converting securities into reserves at any time, without the stigma associated with the discount window, is of limited use in the current context of abundant liquidity but could prompt certain banks to increase their portfolios of Treasuries and Agencies. This could be the case for small banks that, unlike their very large peers, currently hold less securities than they could use considering their SRF limit. * Primary dealers and, from 1 October 2021, depository institutions with total assets of more than USD 30 billion or with a securities portfolio of over USD 5 billion at 30 June 2021. According to S&P Global Market Intelligence figures, 69 depository institutions could access the facility. ** Through sales of Treasuries, debt securities and MBSs issued by mortgage guarantee agencies to the Fed on a repo basis.
US inflation: increasing discomfort 7/26/2021
Annual inflation has reached 5.3% in the US in June. Its drivers are still very concentrated but there is concern that they will spread. Anecdotal evidence is accumulating that price pressures faced by companies are increasing. Price pressures as reported in the ISM survey send the same signal. Historically, they have been highly correlated with producer price inflation and consumer price inflation but the transmission depends on factors such as pricing power, competitive position, labour market bottlenecks, etc. The next several months will be crucial for the Federal Reserve and for financial markets, considering the Fed’s conviction that the inflation increase should be temporary. The bond market has bought into this view thus far but, going forward, its sensitivity to upside surprises to inflation should be higher than normal.

ABOUT US Three teams of economists (OECD countries research, emerging economies and country risk, banking economics) make up BNP Paribas Economic Research Department.
This website presents their analyses.
The website contains 1614 articles and 292 videos