eco TV Week

The economic consequences of the coronavirus

2/7/2020

The outbreak of the coronavirus is a textbook example of an exogenous shock. It forces a rethink of the scenario for growth for the next months by looking at the demand and the supply side effects.

William DE VIJLDER

TRANSCRIPT // The economic consequences of the coronavirus : February 2020

Part 1

A demand shock

The outbreak of the coronavirus is a textbook example of an exogenous shock. It forces a rethink of the scenario for growth for the next months by looking at the demand and the supply side effects.

On the demand side various transmission channels can be distinguished. Household consumption is impacted because people have to stay at home, suffer from an income loss, feel uncertain and hence postpone big ticket purchases. Foreign travel declines as well as purchases of foreign goods, so imports declines. Public spending will tend to increase, either to build health care facilities, or, possibly, to support growth (this could also happen via tax cuts or spending incentives). Corporate investment will decline because of reduced demand but in particular, increased uncertainty. Companies will probably hold off investing until they have enough confidence that the epidemic will not spread further. The decline of imports and tourism represents a direct spillover effect to the rest of the world. Exports can also suffer because of what happens on the supply side.

Part 2

A supply shock

Production declines because of a drop in demand and a shutdown of factories, shops and offices. Global value chains cause international repercussions, all the more so because substitution effects will be small in the short run, because customers prefer to wait rather than switching to another brand, or simply because it’s impossible to reorganise the value chain at short notice. In addition, for a temporary shock, this would make little economic sense. Another consequence is massive destocking.

Part 3

What kind of recovery?

Estimates of the consequences for growth are very much hypothetical. SARS is estimated to have had a negative impact on GDP growth in Hong Kong of 2.6% for the full year 2003 and 1% in China. In the US the impact was tiny (0.07%).

Of course, that was another era: China’s economic size and weight in the world economy were a lot smaller, tourism was a fraction what it is today and the importance of China in global value chains was also a lot smaller.

To put it differently, the impact will be bigger than SARS but how much very much depends on the assumptions.

The coronavirus epidemic comes at a particularly bad moment: based on survey data, the global economy was showing tentative signs of a growth pick-up and, in all likelihood, this momentum will now be stopped or even reversed, depending on the country or sector.

The key question is, for how long and, subsequently, what kind of recovery can be expected, once the epidemic has passed its peak.

On the former question, the view of financial markets seems to be that it will be brought under control quite rapidly. This implies it is crucial to indeed see quite soon a lasting reduction in the daily number of new victims.

On the latter, the one about the type of recovery, the case can be made for a V-shaped recovery in demand. Inventories, after the big drawdown, will need to be replenished. There is also a phenomenon of pent-up demand which will be unleashed, although that will probably be less the case as far as tourism is concerned.

In the medium run, the supply side may also be impacted via changes in global value chains in case companies would consider to be too dependent on a single country in terms of intermediate inputs.

In the short run, we have to prepare ourselves for weak data in February and March so business surveys in April will become particularly important to assess whether by then we will have seen the worst in terms of economic impact.

 

 

View more videos Eco TV Week

On the Same Theme

Economic recovery is broadening 9/18/2020
China’s economic dynamics continued to improve in August 2020. As seen in our monthly Pulse, the expansion of the blue area compared to the dotted area shows a more widespread recovery in activity. Whereas the improvement since March was initially driven by the rebound in industrial production and investment in public infrastructure and real estate, it has now reached other parts of the economy [...]
The global repercussions of the Federal Reserve’s inflation averaging strategy 9/4/2020
The Fed’s new inflation averaging strategy should have global real and financial spillover effects. The former refer to international trade whereby a more sustained expansion of US GDP should pull along the economies of its trading partners via increased US imports. The financial spillovers are driven by capital flows, monetary policy and risk appetite. These factors are highly intertwined. The new Fed strategy will also force other central banks to revisit their own strategy. This creates an issue for the ECB.
China: investment recovery continues 9/2/2020
Activity indicators for July reflected the continued recovery of the Chinese economy. Real GDP growth already rebounded to 3.2% year-on-year in Q2 2020, up from a 6.8% contraction in Q1. The acceleration in investment growth since March has been driven mainly by public infrastructure projects, the construction and the real estate sectors, which have been supported by the government’s stimulus measures. Manufacturing investment has recovered more slowly, held back by the financial difficulties of corporates, particularly amongst SMEs. In the second half of 2020, investment in public infrastructure is set to remain strong, helped by continued expansionary fiscal policy. Monetary policy, by contrast, might become slightly more cautious, contributing to a slowdown in the recovery in the real estate sector. Lastly, investment in the manufacturing sector could strengthen slightly given the rebound in profits of industrial enterprises since May. Exports of manufactured goods have strengthened over the past two months, but their outlook remains clouded by the weakness of global demand and tensions between China and the US.
Looking beyond the second quarter GDP numbers 7/31/2020
Unsurprisingly, this week’s GDP numbers for the second quarter were exceptionally bad. The third quarter should see strong quarterly growth, if only because of a powerful base effect. It also leaves room for disappointment however, should the growth momentum start to slip over the summer. In the US, this already seems to have started. In the euro area, business surveys continue to improve and the employment expectations indicator sees a marked increase. Households are not convinced however and their unemployment expectations have remained broadly stable.
Real GDP is back to its pre-crisis level 7/24/2020
China’s economic dynamics continued to improve in June. In fact, real GDP rebounded by 11.5% quarter-on-quarter (-3.2% year-on-year), which was strong enough to completely regain the ground that was lost in Q1...
Covid-19 and the environment 7/17/2020
Due to the externalities of economic activity, the lockdown has had a considerable impact, not only on the economy but also on the environment. In a post-lockdown world, the question is how and to what extent the experience of the pandemic will influence the environment in the years to come. Covid-19 may make people more health-focused, including how the environment influences one’s health. This may change behaviour in terms of mobility and spending. It may also cause an increase in the allocation to sustainable investments, which in turn could influence corporate strategies. Changes in global value chains can also have an environmental impact. For fiscal policy, there is an opportunity of meeting the short-term goal of boosting the post-pandemic recovery by making investments that contribute to reaching the goals related to climate change and the environment.
What comes after the mechanical rebound? 7/15/2020
The easing of lockdown measures has caused a significant improvement in business sentiment and a mechanical rebound in activity and demand. In the near term, the narrowing of the gap between observed and normal activity levels should gradually lead to less spectacular growth numbers. These are underpinned by pent-up demand, monetary and fiscal policy support and the possibility for households to use the extra-savings accumulated during the lockdown. A lot will depend however on how uncertainty evolves. The health situation is not under control in certain countries and there are concerns about the risk of a flare-up. Households face income uncertainty due to bleak labour market prospects. Against this background, companies may tune down their investment plans.
A gradual but uneven rebound 7/15/2020
The economy has been recovering gradually since March, and the rebound in real GDP should be strong enough to enable it to recover rapidly the ground lost in the first quarter. Yet the shock triggered by the pandemic and the ensuing lockdown measures has severely weakened some sectors (such as export-oriented industries), some corporates (notably micro-enterprises and SMEs) and some households (especially low-income earners). The central bank has cautiously eased credit conditions and the government has introduced a stimulus plan estimated at about 5 points of GDP for 2020. Public investment in infrastructure projects remains the instrument of choice, but direct support to corporates and households is also expected to boost private demand.    
How to spend it? Vouchers versus VAT cuts 7/3/2020
The bleak outlook for the labour market implies there is a strong case for measures to boost consumer spending in order to keep the recovery on track. A host of instruments can be considered: vouchers, VAT rate cuts, income tax cuts, tax credits, negative income taxes. Amongst these, a voucher programme offers many advantages given the possibility for fine-tuning the target group, the final beneficiaries, the type of spending and the regional dimension. However, it comes with considerable administrative costs.

ABOUT US Three teams of economists (OECD countries research, emerging economies and country risk, banking economics) make up BNP Paribas Economic Research Department.
This website presents their analyses.
The website contains 2511 articles and 648 videos