eco TV Week

Does the support of an IPS constitute state aid?


The European commission's decision on the support plan for NordLB is expected in the next few days. This offers, for the first time, an opportunity to question the coherence of European state aid rules and the existence of IPS with state-owned members.


TRANSCRIPT // Does the support of an IPS constitute state aid? : November 2019

In the days to come, the European Commission will give its opinion about the restructuring plan of Norddeutsche Landesbank. This plan has a specific interest.

It brings, for the first time, a chance to question the adequacy of European rules on state aid and banking regulation. On reading the European Treaty, it is possible that recapitalisation measures in favour of NordLB could be treated as state aid since they only mobilize state resources.

NordLB is de facto a state-owned bank, like all German Landesbanken. It belongs to two Länder and to their savings banks.

To be considered compatible with the internal market and have the approval of the European Commission, a plan interpreted as state aid must guarantee the viability of the bank over the long term, have a satisfactory burden-sharing and come with safeguards against distortions of competition.

This plan to rescue NordLB is of an unusual nature. In contrast to previous plans put in place to support the Landesbanken, the aid provided to NordLB does not come only from its public shareholders but also from the mutual cooperation and support network, the S-Group, of which it is a member.

This group is officially considered as an Institutional Protection Scheme. In banking regulation, the support packages planned by the IPS are considered as private recovery measures, even when the members of these IPS are state-owned banks.

However, the question is not addressed in the state aid principles. No particular regime has been defined for intervention by an IPS. Eventually, NordLB's restructuring plan should undoubtedly be considered only in terms of the public resources committed by the Länder.

The specific nature of the aid provided by the S-Group should be taken into account. If not, this would lead to judge all interventions of IPS with state-owned members, such as the S-Group, not compatible with the rules of the internal market.

View more videos Eco TV Week

On the Same Theme

Historic stimulus for fighting corona crisis 4/8/2020
The German economy has come to a standstill because of the almost complete lockdown. To fight the economic consequences, the government launched a massive stimulus plan to increase spending in the health sector, protect jobs and support businesses. Nevertheless, production losses may reach dimensions that are well beyond growth falls in previous recessions. In the worst scenario of a three-month lockdown, GDP growth could lose around 20 percentage points and 6 million people may have to join the short-time work scheme.
Covid19 kills economic activity in H1 2020 3/20/2020
In the latest months, economic activity was virtually stagnant. As can be seen in the chart, the export-oriented manufacturing sector was operating well below potential, whereas activity in the more on the domestic market oriented sectors such as construction and services remained buoyant. The outbreak of the Covid19 in Germany has changed the picture completely...
Nearing a turning point 1/24/2020
Economic activity increased by only 0.6% in 2019, as the decline in manufacturing production was offset by increased activity in more domestically oriented sectors. In the coming two years, the economy will be supported by more accommodative fiscal policies. From Q2 2020, the pick-up in exports related to the partial lifting of uncertainties may more than compensate for easing consumption growth. Nevertheless, GDP growth is expected to remain below potential. The possible departure of the SPD from the ruling coalition forms a major political risk.
Nascent signs of stabilization in industry 1/17/2020
The economic climate in Q4 has hardly changed compared to three months earlier. The weakness is concentrated in the manufacturing sector, where production and orders are well below their long-term average. The growth impetus is coming from the more domestic-oriented sectors such as construction and services. Consumer confidence and retail sales remain well oriented thanks to low unemployment, low interest rapidly increasing wages...  
Passed the trough? 12/6/2019
Most indicators for November surprised on the upside. Despite a string of disappointing data, in particular from the manufacturing sector, GDP actually increased in Q3 by a meagre 0.1%, whereas the consensus had expected a further shrinkage (-0.1%). The main reason was robust growth of private consumption, underpinned strong household confidence levels. GfK indicate that household confidence has remained also very strong in Q4. Also net exports contributed positively to growth, as world trade bounced back. Nevertheless, industrial production remained very weak and the strong rebound in orders in September was the only positive surprise for manufacturers.
A ray of hope? 10/25/2019
After months of negative surprises, some indicators of the Pulse have migrated to the right hand side of the chart. In particular, the ifo business climate index stabilised in October, whereas the market had expected a further decline. Both ifo and pmi surveys signal a slight improvement in sentiment in manufacturing, although the indices remained deep in contraction territory. This is also confirmed by the continuing weakness of orders in August. Hence, the slight pick-up of industrial activity in that month was probably a statistical blip. The main risk for the economy is that the negative news feed from the export-oriented manufacturing sector is spreading to the domestic economy. GfK reports that consumers are getting more negative about the economy which is also dampening income expectations and their propensity to buy. As a result, consumer confidence is set to decline in November.
Unchanged policy despite stagnation 10/10/2019
Weak data and business cycle indicators suggest that German economy would be in a mild technical recession. The weakness is mainly in the manufacturing sector and has hardly affected the rest of the economy. Despite calls from different quarters, the government is unlikely to launch a fiscal stimulus, beyond what is in the coalition agreement and the climate package. Simulations show that spill-over effects of a fiscal boost to other countries will be limited. Moreover, the implementation might be hampered because of long planning periods and bottlenecks in the labour market. Political tensions could increase after the SPD congress in December.
Fiscal stimulus, hope versus reality 9/27/2019
Germany is probably in a technical recession and recent data do not point to any improvement in the near term, quite to the contrary. Given the country’s considerable budget surplus, German business leaders are calling for fiscal stimulus. This echoes Mario Draghi’s plea in favour of budgetary expansion in countries with fiscal space. Simulations show that spillover effects to other eurozone countries would be small. Moreover, the implementation of a fiscal package requires long preparation and may be hampered by labour shortages.
Slowdown is spreading 9/13/2019
Business cycle indicators mostly disappointed during the summer months and ended up below the already subdued expectations. In July, both industrial production and orders fell sharply. This could be partly attributed to the early start of the summer holidays. In that case, an opposite effect can be expected in August. More worrying was the more-than-expected decline of the IFO climate index in August, as business conditions in trade and services fell sharply. It is a sign that the deterioration of the business climate is not anymore confined to only manufacturing, something which has been emphasized by the Bundesbank. But this was contradicted in early September by the PMI composite. The indicator was actually stronger than expected, as services growth remained solid.
Ebbing confidence 7/10/2019
As international trade slows, the economy is mainly supported by expansionary fiscal and monetary policies and real disposable income growth. After a mild contracted in Q2, the economy is expected to grow modestly in the second half of the year. In 2020, exports may strengthen again and growth could return to close to potential. Due to its deep integration in global value chains, Germany is relatively hard hit by the global trade slowdown. This integration has undoubtedly brought benefits by improving productivity and skill-intensity. However, it has also accentuated income inequality.

ABOUT US Three teams of economists (OECD countries research, emerging economies and country risk, banking economics) make up BNP Paribas Economic Research Department.
This website presents their analyses.
The website contains 2416 articles and 619 videos