eco TV Week

United States: the increased role of Federal Home Loan Banks


In the US, the preservation of liquidity ratios has hidden the greater use by banks of financing from Federal Home Loan Banks, which themselves are highly exposed to the risk of maturity transformation.


TRANSCRIPT // United States: the increased role of Federal Home Loan Banks : December 2018

Banking regulations sometimes  fail to ensure financial stability. Like when it is thought that some debt instruments have some stabilizing power while they are deprived of it. In the United States, that's the case with new rules on liquidity.

These new rules on liquidity aim among other things to reduce banks’ exposure to liquidity risk. They favour stable or long-term financing rather than short-term financing on markets. But, in order to reach this goal, American banks turn more and more to Federal Home Loan Banks.

The Federal Home Loan Banks are private credit cooperatives to which the Federal Administration gave the mission to support the US real estate market financing. They have the same status as Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac the two main mortgage refinancing agencies. So they benefit from an effective federal guarantee.

Because of this guarantee, the regulatory authorities consider loans from the Federal Home Loan Banks to commercial banks like stable financing. But, for at least three reasons, to turn to Federal Home Loan Banks is not necessarily a guarantee of more stability. First, their access to  the effective federal guarantee is conditional on Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac remaining under conservatorship. Second, the Federal Home Loan Banks are themselves exposed to liquidity risk because they carry out a substantial maturity transformation by borrowing on the short term to lending on the medium term. Third, the liquidity regulations imposed to the Federal Home Loan Banks are not consistent with banking regulations. They say that in case of stress market conditions the Federal Home Loan Banks will not renew maturing loans. But on the commercial banks side, regulations stipulate that banks could continue to use this financing method.

The risk of a brutal interruption in loans from the Federal Home Loan Banks to American banks should not be neglected. It should be really taken into consideration by banking regulatory authorities. To know more, read the last edition of #Conjoncture# on the website of the Economic Research Department. See you next year, in January, for another segment on economy. The whole team of the Economic Research Department

To go further: United States: Will central bank reserves soon become insufficient?  

View more videos Eco TV Week

On the Same Theme

A mixed landscape 6/7/2019
In the United States, the tide hasn’t turned yet for consumers: on the positive side, our barometer points to low unemployment, strong consumer confidence and dynamic household revenues and spending. Inflation is also mild, which boosts purchasing power. Even so, the horizon is not all rosy. Positioned in the forefront of the economic cycle, industrial leaders report a decline in output, which was one of the barometer’s weakest scores in April, and their expectations did not pick up in May.
About the decline in US long-term rates 6/5/2019
Interest rates on US federal government debt have declined significantly in recent months. With the yield on 10-year Treasuries at 2.1%, the Federal government’s cost of borrowing has fallen to the lowest level since September 2017. President Donald Trump is bound to be pleased. The supremacy of the dollar offers him the privilege of being able to widen the deficit almost endlessly, at a time when the appetite for US Treasuries seems to be inexhaustible. Yet the stronger demand for Treasuries is also a warning signal: it indicates that investors are seeking safe havens as they form more cautious expectations. In the United States, the decline in yields is also a faithful indicator of a deterioration in the business climate.
The import tariff boomerang 5/17/2019
Import tariffs have a negative impact on the targeted country. Retaliation will in turn have negative consequences for the country which started the tariff hikes. Even in the absence of retaliation, there will be negative consequences. Household spending will suffer from a loss of spending power due to an increase in inflation following higher import prices and/or a switch to domestically produced goods. For the same reason, aggregate corporate profits may suffer. Companies may also cut back their investment because of increased uncertainty. Empirical research confirms these outcomes.
Strong growth but questions about quality 5/3/2019
According to Jerome Powell, the fundamentals supporting the US economy remain solid. First quarter growth has been robust but underlying concerns about the quality of growth have emerged. Growth has benefitted from a drop in imports and rising inventory levels while residential investment acted as a drag. In the coming months, imports should rebound and inventories should witness a scale back. The onus will fall on consumer spending and corporate investment to neutralise the effects of these anticipated headwinds on growth.
United States, is the flattening yield curve a concern? 5/3/2019
In the United States, the flattening yield curve is neither accidental, nor insignificant. It anticipates an economic slowdown.
Strong growth, low inflation 4/26/2019
The first quarter turned out to be strong after all. The just released first estimate for first quarter GDP showed an annualised quarter over quarter increase of 3.2%, ahead of the consensus number of +2.3% and better than the previous quarter (+2.2%). Data released earlier this month had suggested that March looked good though not great.
Inversion, then recession? 4/19/2019
Although losing steam, the economic activity in the US is seen keeping on a rather dynamic path in 2019. The International Monetary Fund still forecasts a 2.3% increase in GDP this year, while delivering an increasingly cautious message in the meantime. The IMF recently pointed out several risk factors, including the record high corporate debt ratio, the opacity and less stringent standards on the leveraged loan market, and stretched equity market valuations. Moreover, the inversion of the yield curve is virtually complete, which in the past has always been an early-warning sign of recession.
Three different messages from Washington DC 4/12/2019
President Trump has argued that the US economy would get a boost if the Federal Reserve were to cut rates. The minutes of the FOMC show the members are confident about the growth outlook. The outlook for inflation, against a background of global uncertainties, allows them to be patient in terms of policy. The IMF in its latest Global Financial Stability Report expresses concern about how high debt levels weigh on the resilience when faced with significantly slower growth or higher borrowing costs. This implies that Fed policy will not only be confidently patient but also patiently vigilant.
United States: Non-bank finance has relatively higher exposure to poor quality auto loans 4/10/2019
At year-end 2018, auto loans outstanding peaked at US 1,274 billion in the United States. This is the third largest debt category for American households, behind mortgage loans (67%) and student loans (11%). At 9% of total loans outstanding, their weight has increased constantly since 2010. The Federal Reserve Bank of New York recently released unpublished data broken down by lending sector. In Q3 2018, non-bank finance companies originated 12% of loans outstanding, half of which were subprime loans*. These auto finance companies, which are generally highly leveraged, remain highly exposed to credit risk (only 17% of loans outstanding are securitized). It does not augur well for these finance companies that the share of auto loans with late payments of more than 90 days has increased constantly, to 4.5% at year-end 2018. * loans to borrowers with a credit rating of less than 620
Pressure on central bank liquidity is going undetected 4/9/2019
Since 20 March, American banks have been making overnight transactions with base money at higher rates than the US Federal Reserve pays on their current accounts. At a time of abundant central bank reserves (compared to pre-crisis standards), this unusual structure for money market rates comes as a surprise. This rate structure reflects the tensions on central bank liquidity over the past year, in terms of both demand (driven up by new liquidity requirements) and supply (squeezed by a more attractive repo market). Without an intensification of transactions in the interbank market, the Fed is unlikely to change its decision to continue reducing its balance sheet through the end of September. Yet there are clear signs that central bank liquidity is under pressure, although it is going undetected because it is occurring outside of the money market and thus off the monetary authorities’ radar. In the end, the Fed may have to reinject central bank money notably via Treasury repurchase agreements (repos). Reducing reverse repo operations with foreign central banks would be a faster solution that would not change the size of its balance sheet.

ABOUT US Three teams of economists (OECD countries research, emerging economies and country risk, banking economics) make up BNP Paribas Economic Research Department.
This website presents their analyses.
The website contains 2141 articles and 562 videos