Based in Paris, BNP Paribas' Economic Research Department is composed of economists and statisticians:
The Economic Research department’s mission is to cater to the economic research needs of the clients, business lines and functions of BNP Paribas. Our team of economists and statisticians covers a large number of advanced, developing and emerging countries, the real economy, financial markets and banking. As we foster the sharing of our research output with anyone who is interested in the economic situation or who needs insight into specific economic issues, this website presents our analysis, videos and podcasts.
+331 58 16 03 63 helene.baudchon@bnpparibas.com
The Q3 2020 rebound in the Eurozone GDP growth was stronger than expected: 12.7% q/q, compared to expectations of 10.5%. Of the region’s four biggest economies, France reported the strongest rebound followed by Spain, Italy and Germany. This rebound only partially erased the massive negative shock earlier this year. In Germany, France and Italy, GDP was still about 4% below the Q4 2019 level, while Spanish was still down by 9%. All components of demand contributed to French GDP growth. Sector differences reveal the heterogeneous impact of the shock. In all four countries, the rebound was largely mechanical, but other factors also came into play. Emergency measures to offset the impact of the lockdown last spring constituted a strong support
The main economic news is the publication by INSEE, on Friday 30 October, of its preliminary estimate for French GDP growth in Q3. The surprise has been on the upside, as the figure of 18.2% q/q growth is higher than our forecast of a 16% q/q gain. The rebound has been as spectacular as the collapse that preceded it (-5.9% q/q in Q1 and -13.7% q/q in Q2), but did not make up all of the ground lost: GDP is still 4% lower than its level at end-2019. All components of GDP showed better than expected improvements. The contribution from changes in inventories, which was more negative than expected, took a little of the shine off the recovery...
Has household consumption, the driving force behind French growth, stalled? Or was it actually in the process of rebounding? In 2019, household consumption rose at an average annual rate of 1.5% in real terms, which is considered to be a disappointing performance. But “disappointing” on what grounds and from which standpoint? Are we really dealing with a feeble rebound? These are difficult questions to answer, since everything depends on the perspective we take and the determinants we look at. In this article, we will try to put household consumption into context, and provide answers and explanations for the above issues. In a descriptive analysis in part one, we examine household consumption’s role as a growth engine, its momentum and composition. The second part is explanatory
After a rapid restart in May and June, the economy was back to 95% of its normal level in August. However, the improvement is now slowing as the automatic catch-up effects fall away and as substantial disparities between sectors and persistent public health constraints and uncertainties remain in play. Even so, Q3 is expected to see a substantial rebound (of around 15% q/q). It will be in Q4 that growth is likely to fall back like a soufflé. This period will determine the next chapter in the recovery. Hence the significance of the stimulus package in its double role of softening the blow from the crisis and boosting the recovery now under way. We estimate that this package will add 0.6 of a point to growth in 2021, taking it to 6.9%, after a contraction of 9.8% in 2020.
Signs of the French economic recovery since the lockdown was lifted on 11 May are starting to show in our Pulse barometer...
While the economic horizon cleared up a bit in May, the improvement was much bigger in June. Given its construction, our Pulse does not yet show any traces of this rebound, which is just as remarkable as the preceding plunge [...]
The shape of the post-crisis recovery will depend on the characteristics of each economy, the fiscal response and the level of integration in global value chains. Even before the COVID-19 crisis, some eurozone economies were more vulnerable than others. High levels of debt or unemployment could limit the strength of the recovery. At a domestic level, the sectoral structure, the pattern of private consumption and the labour market situation will be crucial. A high dependency on tourism, a sector durably impacted by the crisis, could hold back the recovery. At the external level, a slow recovery in global trade would hit the most open economies. Moreover, the distortions in global value chains during this crisis could weaken the most highly-integrated economies over a longer period.
