The series of emergency measures adopted by the authorities to stop the renewed decline in forex reserves have also raised questions on how severe was the situation. The measures have been notably aimed at i) protecting savings of households and companies whilst encouraging them to increase their lira-denominated assets; ii) attracting foreign investment[1]. Other measures can even be considered as ‘soft’ foreign exchange controls (requirement for companies to repatriate and convert 25% of their revenue in USD, euro or sterling, increased monitoring by the TCMB of sizeable purchases of foreign currency by companies), although President Erdogan has ruled out strict capital controls.
Since the last week of December, pressures on the exchange rate, interest rates and the TCMB’s forex reserves have eased somehow. By mid-January, forex reserves were estimated at USD109 billion, including around USD70 billion in foreign currency. TCMB’s weekly monitoring suggests that the dollarisation trend has even been reversed (after correction for exchange rate effects, foreign currency deposits of individuals and companies fell by nearly USD5 billion). Also in mid-January, the Ministry of Finance indicated that some USD 9.7 billion were covered by the indexation mechanism. Meanwhile, non-resident positions in the offshore swap market were estimated at just USD 2 billion on 9 January, from USD7 billion in mid-November and USD21 billion at the start of 2021.
However, this very recent de-dollarization is far from assured, as the indexation mechanism have mainly attracted TRL deposits and more marginally those in dollars. Most importantly, official forex reserves look low in net terms (i.e. after deducting foreign currency placed by banks in reserve with the TCMB), at just USD 15 billion[2]. On 9 January, the value of equities & government securities in TRL held by non-residents was still USD22 billion, from USD28 billion in mid-November.
The risks of the New Economic Policy
This financial instability is a by-product of the authorities’ strategy, which is to support growth through exports, thanks to a weak currency, and stimulate investment through a deliberate relaxation of monetary policy to support domestic lending (the TCMB’s main policy rate has been cut from 19% in September to 14%, leading to significantly negative real interest rates). By boosting competitiveness, authorities expect to foster the current account balance and to stabilize the exchange rate, indirectly reducing inflation. In the meantime, liquidity support from Gulf States would be a possible option to foster forex reserves.
However, this strategy carries a number of risks. As inflation accelerates, household confidence has historically fallen, despite measures adopted to offset the loss of purchasing power (such as the exceptional 50% increase in the minimum wage on 1 January, which will be likely followed by a further increase in the second half).
True, the impact of currency depreciation on the current account is significant: between 0.5 and 1 point of GDP of improvement in the underlying current account balance (i.e. excluding energy and gold) for a depreciation of the real exchange rate of 10%. But any gains would be largely offset by the increased price for net energy imports (5% of GDP in 2021) and net imports of gold, which act as a hedge against inflation. Above all, maintaining gains in currency competitiveness in real terms will require recurrent TRL depreciations.
Balance sheet impact of the depreciation
Currency depreciation also affects the balance sheets of banks and corporates.
The direct exchange rate risk for banks is limited, as they have to balance their on-balance sheet debtor position with an off-balance sheet creditor position, mainly through currency swaps. Moreover, the counterparties to these swaps have changed; since the end of 2019, non-residents have withdrawn (from the offshore market) and the central bank has filled the gap. As a result, banks’ off-balance sheet positions are deemed to be more stable. Moreover, foreign currency bank deposits from residents and non-residents (USD261 billion at the beginning of January) are 37% covered by foreign currencies in blocked accounts and the value of currency swaps with the TCMB (USD96 billion in total).
However, the foreign-currency exposure of corporates is substantially negative (of about USD166 billion in October 2021). The debt ratios of exporting companies (i.e. external debt including import financing loans to revenue from exports of goods and services) has trended upwards over the past decade and now stands at 93%. This is a matter of concern even if there are some risk mitigating factors (at least in the ST); corporates’ short-term foreign currency position is positive (USD63 billion) thanks in particular to the high level of deposit dollarization (66%). The rollover rate of medium and long-term loans was still above 100% up to November. Lastly, domestic debt denominated in foreign currency has been stable at around 20% of GDP since 2015.
The government’s exposure to currency risk is also very high, with foreign-currency debt accounting for two-thirds of its total debt. Fortunately, total government debt remains modest at 40% of GDP.
In summary, the Turkish authorities’ strategy is based largely on winning export market shares as the main engine of growth (as a matter of fact, exports of goods increased by 30% in dollar terms in 2021, around twice the average growth for the main countries of Central Europe). But this strategy will also need corporates to invest and households to maintain consumption levels. Strongly negative real interest rates and indexation measures are expected to help them. But President Erdogan is also appealing to the population’s sense of economic patriotism. In economic terms, this strategy is an uncertain bet on an adjustment through flows (mainly exports), whilst the analysis of stocks (forex reserves, foreign-currency debt of corporates and the government, bank deposit dollarization) highlights potential risks. The fear is that this adjustment may lead to a temporary recession or genuine foreign exchange controls and thus be more a constraint than a choice.
