eco TV
Monitoring US recession risk 1/8/2019

Market behaviour and comments from company executives point towards increasing concern about the risks of a recession in the US. Based on the historical experience, the pace of monthly job creations is a key indicator to assess this risk.

TRANSCRIPT // Monitoring US recession risk : January 2019

CHART OF THE MONTH

 

François Doux: In Chart of the Month, we’re going to talk about the risk of recession in one country in particular: the USA.

William De Vijlder, hello.

 

William De Vijlder: Hello.

 

François Doux: How do we traditionally measure the risk of the USA falling into recession?

 

William De Vijlder: The preferred indicator for economists is the unemployment rate, and specifically its year-on-year change. When that change becomes positive, there has typically been a recession in the past.

 

François Doux: The problem is that the unemployment rate signals a recession, whereas your job is to forecast it.

 

William De Vijlder: Yes, our job is to anticipate developments, so we look at other indicators, hoping to find a signal that shows an increasing probability of recession.

 

François Doux: What are these indicators?

 

William De Vijlder: I’ve chosen two very popular ones.

The first, shown by the red line, is an indicator of sentiment in the US manufacturing sector. We have taken all recessions since 1960 and, for each month of the 24 months preceding the start of the recession, we calculated the average reading for this manufacturing sector indicator. That gives us this average, the red line. We can see a sort of plateau effect. The indicator remains fairly high until around 10 months before the economy enters recession. After that, it falls very quickly.

 

François Doux: And when it falls below 50, the economy is contracting and we are in a recession. Ten months before, there are some words and a blue line. What does that line represent?

 

William De Vijlder: The blue line shows job creations, and we perform the same exercise. For each month, we calculate the average number of jobs created 24 months before the start of a recession, 23 months before etc. We see a very clear trend, which makes it easier to understand. What’s fascinating is that between 24 and 14 months before a recession starts, the figures are fairly high, whereas here they are gradually falling. The important point to note is that, even one or two months before the economy falls into recession, job creations are still running at between 100,000 and 150,000.

 

François Doux: 100,000 to 150,000 jobs being created every month, and the economy can fall into recession just after that.

 

William De Vijlder: Yes, that’s right.

 

François Doux: Last question: what’s the situation today? We have non-farm payroll numbers for November 2018 at 155,000 and an ISM manufacturing index of 59.3. So we’re at the upper end of the range, but your conclusion is that we should remain cautious?

 

William De Vijlder: Absolutely, because optimists will look at one indicator while the others will focus more on job creation numbers. What’s clear to me is that job creations, which is my preferred indicator, will allow us to monitor closely the behaviour of the US economy in 2019.

 

François Doux: We’ll follow it throughout 2019.

View more videos Eco TV

On the Same Theme

A mixed landscape 6/7/2019
In the United States, the tide hasn’t turned yet for consumers: on the positive side, our barometer points to low unemployment, strong consumer confidence and dynamic household revenues and spending. Inflation is also mild, which boosts purchasing power. Even so, the horizon is not all rosy. Positioned in the forefront of the economic cycle, industrial leaders report a decline in output, which was one of the barometer’s weakest scores in April, and their expectations did not pick up in May.
About the decline in US long-term rates 6/5/2019
Interest rates on US federal government debt have declined significantly in recent months. With the yield on 10-year Treasuries at 2.1%, the Federal government’s cost of borrowing has fallen to the lowest level since September 2017. President Donald Trump is bound to be pleased. The supremacy of the dollar offers him the privilege of being able to widen the deficit almost endlessly, at a time when the appetite for US Treasuries seems to be inexhaustible. Yet the stronger demand for Treasuries is also a warning signal: it indicates that investors are seeking safe havens as they form more cautious expectations. In the United States, the decline in yields is also a faithful indicator of a deterioration in the business climate.
The import tariff boomerang 5/17/2019
Import tariffs have a negative impact on the targeted country. Retaliation will in turn have negative consequences for the country which started the tariff hikes. Even in the absence of retaliation, there will be negative consequences. Household spending will suffer from a loss of spending power due to an increase in inflation following higher import prices and/or a switch to domestically produced goods. For the same reason, aggregate corporate profits may suffer. Companies may also cut back their investment because of increased uncertainty. Empirical research confirms these outcomes.
Strong growth but questions about quality 5/3/2019
According to Jerome Powell, the fundamentals supporting the US economy remain solid. First quarter growth has been robust but underlying concerns about the quality of growth have emerged. Growth has benefitted from a drop in imports and rising inventory levels while residential investment acted as a drag. In the coming months, imports should rebound and inventories should witness a scale back. The onus will fall on consumer spending and corporate investment to neutralise the effects of these anticipated headwinds on growth.
United States, is the flattening yield curve a concern? 5/3/2019
In the United States, the flattening yield curve is neither accidental, nor insignificant. It anticipates an economic slowdown.
Strong growth, low inflation 4/26/2019
The first quarter turned out to be strong after all. The just released first estimate for first quarter GDP showed an annualised quarter over quarter increase of 3.2%, ahead of the consensus number of +2.3% and better than the previous quarter (+2.2%). Data released earlier this month had suggested that March looked good though not great.
Inversion, then recession? 4/19/2019
Although losing steam, the economic activity in the US is seen keeping on a rather dynamic path in 2019. The International Monetary Fund still forecasts a 2.3% increase in GDP this year, while delivering an increasingly cautious message in the meantime. The IMF recently pointed out several risk factors, including the record high corporate debt ratio, the opacity and less stringent standards on the leveraged loan market, and stretched equity market valuations. Moreover, the inversion of the yield curve is virtually complete, which in the past has always been an early-warning sign of recession.
Three different messages from Washington DC 4/12/2019
President Trump has argued that the US economy would get a boost if the Federal Reserve were to cut rates. The minutes of the FOMC show the members are confident about the growth outlook. The outlook for inflation, against a background of global uncertainties, allows them to be patient in terms of policy. The IMF in its latest Global Financial Stability Report expresses concern about how high debt levels weigh on the resilience when faced with significantly slower growth or higher borrowing costs. This implies that Fed policy will not only be confidently patient but also patiently vigilant.
United States: Non-bank finance has relatively higher exposure to poor quality auto loans 4/10/2019
At year-end 2018, auto loans outstanding peaked at US 1,274 billion in the United States. This is the third largest debt category for American households, behind mortgage loans (67%) and student loans (11%). At 9% of total loans outstanding, their weight has increased constantly since 2010. The Federal Reserve Bank of New York recently released unpublished data broken down by lending sector. In Q3 2018, non-bank finance companies originated 12% of loans outstanding, half of which were subprime loans*. These auto finance companies, which are generally highly leveraged, remain highly exposed to credit risk (only 17% of loans outstanding are securitized). It does not augur well for these finance companies that the share of auto loans with late payments of more than 90 days has increased constantly, to 4.5% at year-end 2018. * loans to borrowers with a credit rating of less than 620
Pressure on central bank liquidity is going undetected 4/9/2019
Since 20 March, American banks have been making overnight transactions with base money at higher rates than the US Federal Reserve pays on their current accounts. At a time of abundant central bank reserves (compared to pre-crisis standards), this unusual structure for money market rates comes as a surprise. This rate structure reflects the tensions on central bank liquidity over the past year, in terms of both demand (driven up by new liquidity requirements) and supply (squeezed by a more attractive repo market). Without an intensification of transactions in the interbank market, the Fed is unlikely to change its decision to continue reducing its balance sheet through the end of September. Yet there are clear signs that central bank liquidity is under pressure, although it is going undetected because it is occurring outside of the money market and thus off the monetary authorities’ radar. In the end, the Fed may have to reinject central bank money notably via Treasury repurchase agreements (repos). Reducing reverse repo operations with foreign central banks would be a faster solution that would not change the size of its balance sheet.

ABOUT US Three teams of economists (OECD countries research, emerging economies and country risk, banking economics) make up BNP Paribas Economic Research Department.
This website presents their analyses.
The website contains 2141 articles and 562 videos