China's economic growth model is based on imbalances, characterised by sluggish domestic demand, excess production capacities, strong exports and the pursuit of self-sufficiency, which have implications for its trading partners. While the IMF has recently reiterated the urgent need to boost private consumption, Beijing continues to give the priority to industrial policy and maintains moderately accommodative fiscal and monetary policies. It places cutting-edge sectors, innovation, AI and technological autonomy at the heart of its development strategy. This strategy aims to foster productivity gains and economic growth, while also consolidating China's dominance in global industry and its commitment to "national security".
India’s economic growth is projected to be +7.6% for FY 2025/26, ranking among the highest in Asia. Monetary easing and VAT cuts have bolstered domestic demand. The medium-term outlook remains favourable. The reduction in US tariffs and the gradual rollout of new free trade agreements (FTAs)—including with the US, EU, UK and EFTA—should bolster exports. After decades of protectionism, India is opening up its economy to attract FDI, develop industry, and create high-quality jobs. The government acknowledges the risks that AI poses to employment in the IT services sector.
Malaysia’s economic growth continues to be robust and is projected to remain resilient over the next two years, underpinned by vigorous domestic demand and sustained global consumption of electronic goods. Unlike other ASEAN economies, however, Malaysia has derived little benefit from the decline in Chinese exports to the US market. Moreover, its imports of Chinese products have risen sharply, putting pressure on the manufacturing sector. Like its regional peers, Malaysia is actively expanding its trade and financial partnerships to diversify its exports and attract investment—critical steps to ascending the value chain in artificial intelligence (AI) components.
In 2025, US–China trade tensions led to a sharp drop in US imports from China, while Chinese exports to other regions increased, indicating early signs of trade diversion. For Italy, estimates point to limited but notable export displacement, concentrated in specific sectors, alongside potential gains from lower-cost Chinese intermediate and capital goods. Italian firms report stronger competitive pressures and heightened uncertainty, particularly among exporters. Despite the challenges posed by tariffs and the redirection of Chinese exports in 2025, Italian exports have proved resilient, with growth recorded especially towards the United States.
Asian economies, excluding China, have experienced minimal disruption to their global trade shares despite higher US tariffs. This resilience stems from their export composition, which remains concentrated in electronics, a sector largely spared by US tariff increases and buoyed by AI-driven demand. While the strategy of redirecting Chinese exports from the United States to Asia and other global markets has intensified, it has not been sufficient to fully compensate for China’s decline in U.S. market share.
On 2 February, President Trump announced the approval of a trade agreement with India, reducing "reciprocal" tariffs on Indian imports from 25% to 18% and eliminating the 25% "penalty" imposed on oil purchases from Russia. As a result, Indian goods will face lower tariffs than those from Southeast Asian countries (excluding Singapore), especially Vietnam and Thailand.While India has signed several trade agreements since last year (including a deal with the EU in January), these arrangements will mean it is no longer penalised compared to its Asian neighbours, both on the U.S. and European markets. However, the short- to medium-term impact on its growth will remain modest
In Japan, business conditions showed improvement after holding up well. Household sentiment is also recovering. But real wages decline and the unemployment rate is persistently low.
PMIs improved slightly at the end of 2025. Chinese household sentiment is recovering slowly, but demand is still weak. Labour market is sluggish.
The Japanese economy is caught between a rock and a hard place. Growth has begun to slow towards its potential level. Japan can boast full employment, a buoyant corporate sector and a reduction in its debt-to-GDP ratio. At the same time, inflation repeatedly overshoots the 2% target and real wages are declining, which negatively impacts consumption. US trade policy remains a risk factor, and ongoing structural issues related to weak domestic demand and limited supply in the labour market persist. Finally, long-term interest rates are rising steeply, partly due to expansionary fiscal policy, while the currency continues to depreciate. Faced with this dilemma, the central bank is expected to maintain a gradual rate-hiking approach until it achieves a terminal rate of +1.5% by mid-2027.
In today’s discussion, we delve into the public finances of emerging economies in 2025, based on an exclusive analysis of our most recent EcoPerspectives issue focused on these economies. With robust but slowing growth, rising public debt and limited fiscal flexibility, what challenges and opportunities lie ahead for these countries?
Between 2013 and 2018, India experienced robust productivity growth (increasing by a factor of 1.3, comparable to Vietnam, slightly lower than China, and higher than Indonesia, Malaysia, the Philippines and Thailand). However, from 2019 onwards, productivity in India has stagnated, while it has continued to rise in other countries (with the exception of the Philippines). This trend is particularly concerning given that GDP per capita remains low (in PPP, it was 2.4 times lower than that of China in 2024) and unemployment is high, especially among young people (15.6% in 2024 according to official data). Without a rapid increase in productivity, India could remain a ‘middle-income’ country.
Japan's primary deficit is expected to narrow in 2025 but is likely to increase again to around 2% of GDP in the coming years due to upward pressure on public spending.
After a solid start to the year, Chinese economic growth has gradually slowed. Thanks to a rapid reorientation, exports have weathered the US tariff shock well. They are the main driver of economic activity, while domestic demand remains stubbornly fragile. The authorities have launched an “anti-involution” campaign, but adjusting demand policy in order to boost domestic investment and consumption, at a time when exports may begin to run out of steam, is also becoming urgent. Despite the deterioration in public finances in recent years, the central government and local governments still have some room for manoeuvre to act.
India's economic growth surprised on the upside between April and June 2025 (+7.8% y/y). However, activity is less dynamic than it appears, and the downside risks to growth are high. Household consumption remains sluggish. To support domestic demand and offset the impact of the rise in US tariffs on activity, the government has announced a reduction in VAT rates, even though its fiscal room for manoeuvre is limited. The central bank is likely to remain cautious in its monetary easing, as downward pressure on the rupee remains strong. In the medium term, the growth outlook could deteriorate if the United States maintains tariffs on Indian exports that are much higher than those on products from other Asian countries.
Indonesia is less exposed to the consequences of the US tariff increases than other ASEAN countries, but risks are tilted to the downside. Companies have begun to suspend their investments. Against this backdrop, the authorities have stepped up measures to support the economy. The central bank has cut its key interest rates more than in other Asian countries, and the new Finance Minister has announced an increase in social spending. Public debt remains under control, but it is financed mainly on bond markets, particularly by foreign investors who are concerned about fiscal slippage under the Prabowo administration. However, although this government is less conservative than the previous one and the situation calls for greater vigilance, the risks to debt sustainability are contained.
The Tankan survey reported an improvement in large Japonese manufacturing companies' sentiment (14) in Q3, including in the motor vehicles sector (10). The overall figure (all enterprises and all industries) remained stable (10). The Services PMI remained stable at a high level (53) in September, while the Manufacturing PMI (48.4) fell to a five-month low due to the first contraction in hiring (49.4) since November 2024 and a decline in output (47.3, -2.5 pp).
In the Chinese manufacturing sector, the official PMI has remained in contraction territory since April, but it improved to 49.8 in September. The PMI published by RatingDog (formerly Caixin) also improved (to 51.2 from 50.5 in August and 49.5 in July). This slight recovery is notably due to the “new export orders” sub-component, which reached 47.8 in the official index – a level that, while still in contraction territory, is at its highest since March. The export sector continues to withstand the rise in US tariffs.
The Japanese economy has been showing some momentum for just over a year. However, this performance is likely to fade in the second half of the year, not least as a result of the tightening of US trade policy. The labour market remains tight, and inflation continues to exceed the 2% target. Caught between an economic situation that may signal a weakening and a sharp rise in long-term interest rates amid fiscal concerns, the Bank of Japan (BoJ) is exercising extreme caution by raising its policy rate very gradually.
In the first half of 2025 (H1 2025) and according to the Carbon Monitor website, China would have reduced its carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions by around 3% compared to the same period last year. Even if this is good news coming from the world's largest CO2 emitter (30% of the total), this is not surprising given the slowdown in the energy sector. In the same first half of 2025, the growth in electricity production slowed to 2.3% year-on-year, which is low by Chinese standards. Historically well correlated with emissions, weak electricity output largely explains the above-mentioned figure.
Since the beginning of the year, China’s economic growth has proved to be more robust than expected. Exports have withstood US tariff attacks and household consumption has recovered thanks to government stimulus programs. However, large clouds are casting a shadow over the picture and are likely to slow growth in the second half of the year. On the one hand, trade tensions with the United States remain high and the tech war continues, even though Beijing and Washington have agreed to extend their truce until November. On the other hand, internal structural problems remain (real estate crisis, labour market fragility, low confidence in the private sector, deflation). Despite this gloomy backdrop, economic policy easing remains cautious
Despite robust growth between April and June 2025 (probably overestimated), the government is stepping up measures to support the Indian economy. The “Goods and Services Tax Council”, which is due to meet on 3 and 4 September, is expected to approve a cut in VAT rates. This measure would counteract the effects of the increase in US tariffs without weakening the central government's finances.
Contrary to what was feared at the end of 2024-beginning of 2025, exports of goods of emerging countries held up well in the first part of the year. Asian countries are showing the best performances and Latin American countries are doing well. On the other hand, Central European countries appear, if not as the losers, at least as the most vulnerable to the transformations of global trade since the Covid crisis. For a large majority of EM, corporates’ expectations about their order books in June suggest a decline or slowdown in exports in the coming months.
Favourable developments for the business climate. The manufacturing PMI stood at 50.1 in June (+0.7 pp, the first expansion posted since May 2024) thanks to growth in output (51.2, +2.5 pp). The services sector also improved (51.7, +0.7 pp). In Q2, the Tankan business conditions survey remained stable overall (15) for both the manufacturing (7) and non-manufacturing (21) sectors, despite the issue of US tariffs.
Trade truce. The official PMI for the manufacturing sector has been in contraction territory since April, mainly due to the US-China trade war and worsening export prospects. However, the index rose slightly from 49 to 49.5 in May and 49.7 in June, following the agreement reached between Washington and Beijing (after discussions in London in early May and in Geneva in early June). The Caixin manufacturing PMI even rose above 50 in June (vs. 48.3 in May). In the services sector, the official PMI has been close to 50.3 for the past three months.
While FDI inflows into Southeast Asia have been higher on average since 2021 than in the 2016–2019 period, they have declined in India. As a share of GDP, net FDI inflows to India (non-resident FDI inflows minus disinvestment) reached only 0.7% of GDP in 2024, the lowest level since 2012. This decline is all the more surprising given that, according to UNCTAD, the value of greenfield FDI projects announced in the country has been rising sharply since 2022.
