India, a major recipient of gross FDI, is unable to retain it
Between 2017 and 2024, gross FDI inflows into India increased by a factor of 1.3, while disinvestments increased by a factor of nearly 2.9 (Chart 2). Foreign companies sold their assets or repatriated their earnings without reinvesting them in the country.
Neither the deterioration of the economic environment nor the unstable political environment is behind this phenomenon. Excluding the pandemic period, real GDP growth has been robust (higher than the growth seen in Southeast Asian countries), economic prospects have been favourable and macroeconomic risks have been contained.
The disinvestment is due to the business environment and structural constraints weighing on the development of foreign companies in India. Since 2017, infrastructure quality has improved significantly, but corruption, which was already high, has increased and governance is fragile.
India is characterised above all by a much more rigid labour market than in Southeast Asia. The labour law reform (adopted in 2020), which aimed to liberalise the labour market, has still not been implemented and may not be implemented before 2026 (at best). Furthermore, land acquisition remains highly problematic and is a barrier to business establishment and development.
The short-term outlook depends on reforms
FDI flows from China are expected to remain low for the foreseeable future, given the complex political relations between China and India. US investment (14.9% of gross FDI received) could be hampered by the tightening of US trade policy. Investment from the European Union (15.2% of FDI), on the other hand, should accelerate with the signing of a free trade agreement (expected by the end of the year). The challenge for India is to implement reforms that offer more favourable conditions for foreign companies in order to encourage them to set up long-term operations.
In Southeast Asian countries, in the short term, FDI trends will depend on bilateral trade negotiations with the US. “Connector” countries should continue to benefit from Chinese FDI, provided that they are not taxed much more than other countries that supply the US.