Based in Paris, BNP Paribas' Economic Research Department is composed of economists and statisticians:
The Economic Research department’s mission is to cater to the economic research needs of the clients, business lines and functions of BNP Paribas. Our team of economists and statisticians covers a large number of advanced, developing and emerging countries, the real economy, financial markets and banking. As we foster the sharing of our research output with anyone who is interested in the economic situation or who needs insight into specific economic issues, this website presents our analysis, videos and podcasts.
anis.bensaidani@bnpparibas.com
The context surrounding the December 9-10 FOMC meeting (BNP Paribas scenario: -25bp), which marks the final meeting of 2025, serves as a prelude to the challenges that the Federal Reserve will face in 2026. The outlook for the dual mandate calls for differing responses, and uncertainty prevails, fuelled by divisions among FOMC members that stand in contrast to the institution's pro-consensus stance. In the coming year, a significant test awaits US monetary policy and its autonomy, particularly with the succession of Chair Jerome Powell. However, the potential for an abrupt shift in US monetary policy should not be overstated. The Fed's decisions are expected to continue to be driven by economic fundamentals
Since the pandemic, household consumption has evolved very differently between the Eurozone and the United States. In Europe, weak growth in real gross disposable income, moderating wealth effects, and rising real interest rates have dampened demand. In the United States, however, consumption has exceeded what fundamentals would suggest, buoyed by the housing wealth effect and fiscal stimulus. This divergence is likely to narrow, however, with the Eurozone gradually correcting its underperformance, albeit unevenly across countries, while the United States is expected to see an end to its outperformance, without falling into underperformance.
September's US employment figures reported the highest payroll growth since April (+119k). However, this fairly positive reading could prove short-lived due to the impact of the government shutdown. For the Fed, these developments add to the uncertainty surrounding its December meeting. We are still expecting a 25bp rate cut, which is now a close call.
The US primary deficit is expected to narrow in 2025 and stabilise at around 1.0–1.5% of GDP in the coming years thanks to higher customs revenues.
Japan's primary deficit is expected to narrow in 2025 but is likely to increase again to around 2% of GDP in the coming years due to upward pressure on public spending.
Since Donald Trump's return to the White House in 2025, the United States has massively increased its tariffs. As a result, trade flows to the US have been disrupted, but has this affected the dynamics of global trade? And above all, are we heading towards a major restructuring of global trade?
The Fed eased its monetary policy, with two expected announcements: the end of the central bank's balance sheet reduction process from 1st December; and a second straight cut (-25 bp) in the Fed Funds target, without unanimity, bringing it to +3.75% - +4.0%, due to downside risks in the labour market. We anticipate a further 25bp cut in December, driven by the Fed's bias towards employment and downward revisions to our inflation forecasts for the coming quarters. However, this easing cannot be taken for granted, as J. Powell insisted on keeping options open ahead of the upcoming meeting.
The Treasury market is one of the pillars of the global financial system. This is due to its size and liquidity, its role in setting borrowing conditions, and the safety that these securities provide.However, the announcement of so-called 'reciprocal' tariffs last April caused turmoil in the market, reminding us that Treasuries had become more sensitive to periods of stress…
The non-manufacturing ISM fell markedly in September to 50.0. This result was due to a decline in business activity and new orders components. Manufacturing ISM improved to 49.1 in September, driven by output growth (51.0). However, new orders contracted (48.9), particularly those for export (43.0). The rise in prices paid slowed for the third consecutive month (61.9).
The Tankan survey reported an improvement in large Japonese manufacturing companies' sentiment (14) in Q3, including in the motor vehicles sector (10). The overall figure (all enterprises and all industries) remained stable (10). The Services PMI remained stable at a high level (53) in September, while the Manufacturing PMI (48.4) fell to a five-month low due to the first contraction in hiring (49.4) since November 2024 and a decline in output (47.3, -2.5 pp).
Beyond supply factors (see US Federal debt: the risks of abundance) and demand factors (see A safe haven put to the test), banking regulations have also contributed to weakening the Treasuries market. This is the subject of the third instalment of our EcoInsight series on Treasuries.Since 2023, the US authorities have taken various measures to support the liquidity and stability of the Treasuries market (greater transparency of transactions, increased use of centralised clearing of repurchase agreements, programme to buy back the least traded securities).However, the balance sheet constraints faced by the banks responsible for intermediating this market remain an aggravating factor in times of stress
At a time when central banks are navigating between persistent inflation, economic slowdown, and unprecedented structural challenges, their room for maneuver has never been so closely scrutinized. Should they lower rates to support growth, maintain them to anchor inflation, or raise them in the face of unexpected shocks? Between balancing acts, threats to their independence, and regional divergences, the choices made by central bankers will shape the economy of tomorrow.
Why might the Fed cut rates despite stubborn inflation? What card will the ECB play in the face of a fragile European recovery?
US tariffs rose sharply in two stages: first in April, then following the signing of multiple trade agreements this summer. The impact of the first stage of this tariff increase is well known: trade flows to the United States were severely disrupted. However, global trade remains dynamic, particularly in Asia (a structural phenomenon) and Europe (which should benefit from internal momentum with the rebound of the German economy). The restructuring of trade flows (already underway with the rise of China) could accelerate as different countries seek elsewhere the opportunities lost in the United States.
Growth in the United States has slowed significantly compared with 2024 and is expected to remain moderate in the coming months, while maintaining some dynamism. Inflation is gradually rising again, mainly due to higher tariffs, while the labour market is already showing clear signs of weakening. These developments are resulting in a rebalancing of risks around the Federal Reserve's (Fed) dual mandate: downside risks to employment are increasing relative to upside risks to inflation. In our view, this should prompt the Fed to make two further cuts to its policy rate between now and the end of 2025, following the September cut. At the same time, fiscal policy is unlikely to stem the rise in the public debt ratio.
The Japanese economy has been showing some momentum for just over a year. However, this performance is likely to fade in the second half of the year, not least as a result of the tightening of US trade policy. The labour market remains tight, and inflation continues to exceed the 2% target. Caught between an economic situation that may signal a weakening and a sharp rise in long-term interest rates amid fiscal concerns, the Bank of Japan (BoJ) is exercising extreme caution by raising its policy rate very gradually.
As widely anticipated, the 16-17 September FOMC meeting ended with the Fed reducing its target rate by 25bp, while reasserting its independence. While the marked slowdown in payroll growth prompted the Fed to cut the policy rate for the first time in 2025, it reiterated that future decisions would remain data-dependent. In our view, the downside risks to the labour market cast little doubt about the continuation of monetary easing. We anticipate two further 25bp cuts in October and December, bringing the target range to +3.5% – +3.75%, which is in line with market expectations. However, easing is likely to remain limited in terms of both timing and scope, given the actual and expected rebound in inflation.
Following on from the first part of our EcoInsight series on US Treasuries, which focused on the US administration's budget plans (US federal debt: the risks of abundance), this second part we are examining how president Trumps’ excesses have harmful effects on the demand for federal paper.The profile of US Federal Government creditors has changed significantly over the past 20 years. The appeal of Treasuries for so-called ‘long-term’ investors (i.e. foreign central banks, resident pension funds and insurers) has waned. More ‘short-term’ investors (i.e. leveraged funds), who favour procyclical strategies, are now very active in this market. This shift has contributed to undermining the safe-haven status of Treasuries, which are now more sensitive to periods of stress
The August Employment Situation featured weak payroll growth and a rise in the unemployment rate. The release confirmed the downside risks surrounding the US labour market. The FOMC is expected to lower the Fed Funds Target Range (-25 bps) for the first time in 2025 at its 16-17 September meeting.
Considered the safest and most liquid assets in the world, US Treasuries are the first choice of investors seeking security. However, the turmoil that hit their market last April, in the wake of the announcement of new US tariffs, revived memories of the dysfunction caused by the COVID-19 pandemic in March 2020. Despite the magnitude of the shock, the market's loss of liquidity at the time came as a surprise, given Treasuries' safe-haven status. As a matter of fact, more than the shock per se, this fragility is due to structural factors.This first part of our EcoInsight series on Treasuries analyses how the US administration's fiscal plans threaten to exacerbate this fragility
The adverse effects of the Trump administration's trade and migration policies on US economic activity are emerging, as they were reflected in the July Employment Situation report and the economy as a whole is exhibiting further signs of a clear loss of momentum. Meanwhile, the trade agreements recently signed should ease the uncertainty shock. Finally, the rebalancing of risks associated with increased fears about employment could challenge the Fed's wait-and-see stance.
GDP growth figures for the first half of the year were clouded by a series of conflicting factors. In Q2, growth in the Eurozone was hit by a decline in exports, while imports in the United States led to a sharp rebound. This is a backlash from Q1, when additional exports, in anticipation of the tariff shock, had supported growth in the Eurozone, while penalising growth in the United States. Beyond this unusual volatility, it is the robustness of growth that is striking. In the Eurozone, German growth was back, although moderately, and monetary policy easing had an impact, with this robustness set to continue in the second half of the year. In the United States, the slowdown remained relative but is likely to strengthen due to the growing impact of tariffs on inflation and consumption.
Improvement in the ISM. The manufacturing ISM improved modestly (49.0, +0.5 pp) in June, with a notable jump in output (50.3, +4.9 pp), which entered expansion territory for the first time since February. The non-manufacturing ISM returned to growth territory (50.8, +0.9 pp) thanks to a rebound in activity and new orders. The CEO Economic Outlook declined again in Q2, reaching a five-year low (69.3, -14.7 points). The three components assessed (plans for capital investment, plans for U.S. employment, and expectations for sales) have all fallen.
Favourable developments for the business climate. The manufacturing PMI stood at 50.1 in June (+0.7 pp, the first expansion posted since May 2024) thanks to growth in output (51.2, +2.5 pp). The services sector also improved (51.7, +0.7 pp). In Q2, the Tankan business conditions survey remained stable overall (15) for both the manufacturing (7) and non-manufacturing (21) sectors, despite the issue of US tariffs.
The rise in interest rates seen in the advanced economies since the end of Covid has been continuing in scattered order. Long-term interest rates have generally been on the rise, but with significant divergences. The general situation of uncertainty and the undeniably upward trajectories of public debt in advanced countries are having negative repercussions on the bond markets, which are likely to have a similar impact on the financing of the economy.
