Based in Paris, BNP Paribas' Economic Research Department is composed of economists and statisticians:
« The Economic Research department’s mission is to cater to the economic research needs of the clients, business lines and functions of BNP Paribas. Our team of economists and statisticians covers a large number of advanced, developing and emerging countries, the real economy, financial markets and banking. As we foster the sharing of our research output with anyone who is interested in the economic situation or who needs insight into specific economic issues, this website presents our analysis, videos and podcasts. »
+ 33 1 55 77 47 31 william.devijlder@bnpparibas.com
News about growth, inflation and monetary policy influences bond and equity markets. For bonds, the relationship is straightforward but for equities, the relationship is more complex. Therefore, the correlation between bond prices and equity prices fluctuates over time. Since 2000 it has been predominantly negative, thereby creating a diversification effect. It underpins the demand for bonds, even when yields are very low. Unsurprisingly, during the recent Federal Reserve tightening cycle, the correlation has turned positive again. Based on past experience, one would expect that, as the Federal Reserve starts cutting rates later this year, the bond-equity correlation would turn negative again.
The S&P Global manufacturing PMIs for the month of March point towards a pickup in economic momentum in most countries. In the Eurozone, the improvement is strong, especially in manufacturing and to a lesser degree in services. Momentum is slow however in terms of employment. In the US, the recent pickup in manufacturing sentiment is also strong compared to history. Against the background of these and other strong data, Fed officials have insisted on the need for caution in cutting rates, all the more so considering that the pace of disinflation has clearly slowed. The US soft landing view is increasingly being challenged and ‘no landing’ is put forward as an alternative
The data dependent nature of monetary policy has intensified the mutual influence between economic data, financial markets and central banks. Inflation releases play a dominant role given that central banks pursue an inflation target. In the United States, when CPI numbers are published, the change in the financial futures contracts on the federal funds rate has the highest correlation with the monthly change in core inflation. Going forward, Fed watching will consist of monitoring the inflation surprises -the difference between the published number and the consensus forecast- as well as the ensuing market reaction
When questions have been answered, new ones pop up, reflecting a shift in focus. We are again experiencing this phenomenon. Recent comments by Christine Lagarde and Jerome Powell have provided implicit guidance on the timing of the first rate cut. The focus is now shifting to how fast and how far policy rates will be reduced
Recent communication by the Federal Reserve and the ECB has made it clear that the first cut in official interest rates is coming. Both central banks are saying the same -it depends on the data- but the ECB communication is more opaque than that of the Federal Reserve, which provides interest rate projections of the FOMC members (dot plot). In assessing how fast and how much the ECB might cut policy rates in this cycle, several approaches can be adopted. Based on the credibility of the ECB and plausible estimates of the neutral rate, it makes sense to use an assumption of a range between 2.00% and 2.50% for the ECB deposit rate as the end point of the easing cycle.
In the US, the latest Survey of Professional Forecasters (SPF) of the Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia paints a rather upbeat picture of the economic outlook. A similar survey of the ECB points towards a gradual pickup in growth this year. In both cases, the level of disagreement is low. This provides reasons to be hopeful about the economic outlook. However, the alternative scenarios are predominantly negative for growth and inflation, and some have totally different implications for the evolution of bond yields. This would mean that as time goes by and the likelihood of the different alternative scenarios evolves, bond yield volatility could be high.
There is a broad consensus amongst forecasters that Eurozone quarterly growth in real GDP will gradually pick up over the year on the back of a further decline of inflation, cuts in official interest rates, investments in the energy transition and those related to NextGeneration EU. Foreign trade may also play a role. Survey data of the European Commission and S&P Global have improved since the autumn of last year but their level remains below the historical average. Based on historical relationships, their positive momentum -recent observations are better than those 3 months ago- increases the likelihood that GDP growth in the first quarter will be better than in the final quarter of 2023.
‘Economic voting’ — the possible influence of the economic environment on voting behavior — has been the subject of intense debate over the past three decades. A key question in this respect is whether individual economic perceptions are influenced by the political affiliation of voters and if so, whether this influences spending. On both questions, the results of empirical research in the US are not conclusive. With respect to company investments, the conclusion is unambiguous: polarization exerts a negative influence. This last point is enough a reason to argue that the significant increase in political polarization in the US in recent decades matters from an economic perspective
Recently an agreement has been reached between representatives of the European Council, the European Parliament, and the European Commission on a new economic governance framework. It focuses on risk-based surveillance, differentiation between member states based on their specific situation, the integration of fiscal, reform and investment objectives in a medium-term fiscal plan. The single operational indicator in the form of a net expenditure path should facilitate communication and emphasizes the key role of discretionary primary spending rather than tax increases in bringing public finances under control
Despite the positive momentum it would be premature to say that the recovery has started in the Eurozone, but at least we are moving in the right direction.
The recent decision of the German Federal Constitutional Court has fueled the debate on the debt brake, which imposes strict limits in terms of budget deficit. At the risk of oversimplifying, the question is whether fiscal policy should be based on an iron rule or a golden rule. The debt brake imposes fiscal discipline on future governments, which enhances fiscal policy credibility. However, its focus on the budget deficit implies that under realistic assumptions, public debt in percent of GDP will decline significantly. Proponents of the golden rule argue that, given the huge investment needs -green and digital transition, public support to innovation, etc
The narrative of the last mile of disinflation being the hardest, which in 2023 became popular in the world of central banking, reflects concern that after having dropped significantly, further declines in inflation would be more difficult.However, it seems that relevance of this narrative is increasingly being questioned. The account of the December 2023 meeting of the ECB governing council mentions that it has been debated. It seemed that the disinflation of 2023 had been faster than in previous episodes, raising doubts about the relevance of the narrative. A paper of the Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta analyses this topic for the US. Based on recent research on the Phillips curve, it concludes that the ‘last mile’ is likely not significantly more arduous than the rest
BNP Paribas Economic Research wishes you all the best for 2024. On the macroeconomic front, the highlight of 2023 was the peak in official rates in the United States and the eurozone, but what is in store for 2024?In this video, you can discover the topics and points of attention that will be monitored throughout 2024 for each team: Banking Economy, OECD and Country Risk.
In recent speeches and interviews, officials of the Federal Reserve and the ECB have cooled down market enthusiasm about the timing and number of rate cuts this year. In the US, the message is that there is no reason to move as quickly or cut as rapidly as in the past, considering the healthy state of the economy. In the Eurozone, despite the drop in inflation in 2023, there is still uncertainty about the inflation outlook, particularly due to the pace of wage growth. Moreover, there is also a concern that the easing of financial conditions -due to overly optimistic market assumptions about the policy rate path- would be counterproductive from a monetary policy perspective. Both the Federal Reserve and the ECB want to tread carefully in deciding when to start cutting rates
When looking ahead and formulating the forecasts for 2024, it is always relevant to look back at the recent past and to have a final look at 2023. It was a year with many surprises. The resilience of the Labor market in the US and in the euro area faced with aggressive monetary tightening, the resilience of the US economy in general with a staggering growth performance, the stagnation in the euro area, but also the decline in inflation. But the thing that has been the defining characteristic for 2023 to treat undoubtedly, has been the fact that the peak in policy rates has been reached in the United States and in the euro area. When we now look at 2024, we can say that there are two quote unquote certainties.
Further progress in terms of disinflation and the room this creates for central bank easing seem to be the only economic ‘certainties’ for 2024. What is left is a list of important questions that should be answered as the year progresses. What will be the pace and extent of rate cuts? Is there a risk of underestimating the impact of past rate hikes that still must manifest itself? What about the timing and strength of the pickup in growth in reaction to lower inflation and the start of policy easing? Is there a downside to the scenario of a soft landing in the US? The answers to these questions matter for the real economy but are especially important for financial markets and the policy rate expectations.
Almost one year ago, we labeled 2023 as ‘a year of transition to what?’ based on the view that inflation would decline, that official interest rates would reach their peak and a concern that the disinflation process could be bumpy. 2023 has brought us many surprises: the resilience of the labour market in the US and the Eurozone, the extent of monetary tightening, the risk appetite of investors. The biggest surprise was the growth performance of the US economy. Towards the end of the year, the changing message from the Federal Reserve -and to a lesser degree of certain ECB governing council members- with respect to the monetary policy outlook has brought us a another favourable surprise and a hopeful note for 2024.
In two podcasts Daniel Morris, Chief Market Strategist of BNP Paribas Asset Management discusses with William De Vijlder, Group Chief Economist of BNP Paribas the impact of geopolitical uncertainty on the economy. In this first podcast, they look at economic and geopolitical uncertainty, why it matters and how it can be measured.
In the second podcast on geopolitical uncertainty and its economic consequences, Daniel Morris and William De Vijlder look more closely at the impact of geopolitical uncertainty on firms, households and financial markets.
The latest communication from the Federal Reserve -the new projections of the FOMC members for the federal funds rate and the comments of Fed Chair Powell during his press conference- reinforce the view that the US economy should experience a soft landing, which should allay potential worries about the outlook for corporate cash flows and household income. Bond and equity prices rallied, reflecting a feeling amongst investors of ‘Santa Claus is coming to town’. The focus will now shift to the trickier part of the soft landing scenario: how fast and far will rates be cut? Another important question is when will bond markets start to anticipate the risk that the pick-up in growth that should follow from further disinflation and lower interest rates would quickly lead to new bottlenecks.
As the year is drawing to a close, time has come for economists to look back and to assess to what extent 2023 has been in line with expectations or has brought us many surprises. Let's start with the first part, 2023 in line with expectations. Well, the first dimension, the first dynamic, very important is disinflation.Headline inflation has declined very significantly thanks to a base effect, the decline in energy prices, but also core inflation.
In a recent speech, ECB President Christine Lagarde said that when the financing needs of an economic transformation exceed the capacities of fragmented financial markets, developing a capital markets union becomes crucial. This is the point at which the EU has arrived. According to European Commission estimates, financing the energy and digital transition will require more than EUR 700 billion annually. One way of reducing capital market fragmentation is by lowering the cost of information gathering for investors, e.g. through the harmonisation and, where possible, simplification of standards and regulations. This would increase the risk bearing capacity of investors and lower the cost of financing for issuers
Recent business surveys suggest that the cyclical environment in the Eurozone, Germany and France is stabilising but it would be premature to call it a bottoming out. Such a positive development seems unlikely in the near term. Monetary policy is expected to remain tight for some time and part of the effect of the past rate hikes still needs to manifest itself. Bank lending policy is expected to remain cautious because of rising credit risk in a stagnating, high interest rates economy and credit demand from firms and households is weak. Significant progress in terms of disinflation seems to be a necessary condition for a lasting upturn in the economic outlook.
Several central bankers have recently insisted that the ‘last mile’ in the marathon towards the inflation target may be the most challenging. After an initial swift decline of headline inflation on the back of favourable base effects due to lower energy prices, further disinflation may take more time. Corporate pricing power, inflation expectations and wage growth play a key role in this respect. By insisting on the ‘last mile’, central bankers probably want to avoid sounding too optimistic on disinflation. Otherwise, financial markets might price in early rate cuts, which would cause an easing of financial conditions in capital markets that would neutralize part of the monetary tightening
Monetary policy desynchronization between the Federal Reserve and the Bank of Japan (BoJ) has become huge. This has caused a significant weakening of the yen. Higher US yields have also exerted upward pressure on JGB yields, which in turn has forced a gradual adjustment of the BoJ yield curve control policy (YCC). Inflation developments in Japan increase the likelihood of a policy rate increase but policy normalization is a delicate task for domestic reasons as well as international spillovers. The BoJ has chosen a cautious approach, with very incremental steps, but in the meantime the yen has continued to weaken, creating the risk of a snapback once policy is tightened. Acting sooner rather than later seems to be the recommended route for the BoJ.