eco TV Week

What 2019 tells us about 2020


The topics which have characterised 2019 are expected to remain very relevant in 2020: slow growth, elevated uncertainty, low inflation, low interest rates.


TRANSCRIPT // What 2019 tells us about 2020 : December 2019

The key takeaways from 2019

It’s that time of the year again: as the festive season approaches, economists polish their crystal ball and produce an outlook for next year.

In gauging what 2020 may bring, 2019 actually offers many insights, so looking in the rear view mirror is actually a useful exercise.

Let’s start with the key takeaways of the year which is almost over.

Firstly, global growth has slowed down. It started with exports, then moved to manufacturing and eventually impacted services, though this sector has been quite resilient.

Secondly, uncertainty has been a very frequently used word although assessing the impact on growth is difficult. It did not stock markets in having a superb performance, so they have climbed a wall of worry, with the help of lower interest rates. Corporate investments have weakened in the US but were strong in the eurozone.

Thirdly, monetary policy has been eased further by the ECB and the Fed changed direction. This reflects that these central banks, cognisant of their limited room for manoeuvre, are risk averse: if you want to reach your inflation target, make sure to avoid a big growth slowdown. Yet there is now a feeling that the limit has been reached or that we’re at least close to it. Hence the renewed interest in fiscal policy but also the strategy review conducted by the Fed and soon to be started by the ECB.

Finally, climate change has moved to the top of the agenda, at least of households and companies, less so unfortunately for certain governments, witness the disappointing COP25 summit in Madrid.

2020: more of the same

Next year will probably bring more of the same in a number of areas.

Growth is expected to remain on the slow side. The stabilisation of survey data in recent months creates hope that, on the back of the supportive monetary/fiscal policy mix, some growth pick-up would materialise. In the absence thereof, disappointment would follow, leading to even slower growth.

To some degree this depends on what happens to uncertainty. Trade tensions may ease (think of US versus China) but will not disappear. They may actually intensify (think of US versus the European Union). On Brexit, difficult negotiations about the future relationship mean that hard Brexit fears will not disappear.

Inflation is expected to remain low or, in the eurozone, too low. Slower growth implies slower wage growth which makes an acceleration in inflation a more remote possibility.

Official interest in the US and the eurozone will remain very low. Christine Lagarde has said that even 1.6% inflation in 2022 would not be satisfactory, which should be read as ‘does not justify a rate hike’. In the US we actually expect two rate cuts in the first semester in reaction to slower growth.

2020: year of change

Next year may bring change in at least two areas.

The results of the strategy review of the Fed about its objectives, its tools and its communication will be eagerly awaited in the first half of 2020. Any hint at ‘low for longer’ would have an impact on financial markets and the dollar. It will also trigger speculation about whether the ECB, which will also be conducting a strategy review, will follow the Fed’s change in emphasis should there be one.

Hopefully, next year will bring significant change in terms of how to address the huge challenge of global warming. The disappointment of the COP25 in Madrid last week makes the COP26 crucially important and we have to hope that the British government will come up with an ambitious agenda as organiser of the summit.

The recently announced Green Deal of the European Commission with the ambition to make the EU carbon neutral by 2050 has raised expectations of policy measures such as a carbon border tax in order to create a level playing field between production in the EU (and the associated emission regulation) and imports from countries with a looser regime.

In this respect, the ECB will also be watched carefully: Christine Lagarde has made it clear that she was ready to make aggressive strides toward environmental objectives. Howevern, in the ECB’s governing council, opinions are divided as many fear that that the ECB might enter a political minefield.

Thank you for watching EcoTV Week and I invite you to join us again next week.

View more videos Eco TV Week

On the Same Theme

Covid-19, unemployment, human capital and households’ balance sheet 5/28/2020
In the first episode, William De Vijlder takes a look at households’ balance sheets by considering how assets and liabilities are influenced by the pandemic. We will also see how the loss of human capital due to the deterioration of the labour market plays a key role in the post-pandemic economic environment.
Dilemma for businesses: reduce debt or invest? 5/28/2020
The second episode focuses on non-financial companies. As well as having a considerable impact on their short-term (cash) and long-term assets (imperative of aligning their operational model with new requirements in terms of supply chain resilience), the Covid-19 crisis has obliged businesses to increase their indebtedness. This confronts them with a dilemma whether to strengthen their balance sheet by paying back debt or to maintain a high degree of leverage an invest.
Ever bigger central balance sheets raise question about where is the limit 5/28/2020
Central banks have played a key role in supporting the economy during the pandemic-induced recession. To do so, they increased the size of their balance sheet. William De Vijlder explains the mechanisms governing this increase in their balance sheet. Is there any limit on how far it might go? He also explains the concept of direct monetary financing.
Following the surge in the debt/GDP ratio, what action will the governments prioritise? 5/28/2020
In response to the pandemic, many governments took a vast range of measures to curb the impact of the pandemic on the economy. In this final episode, William De Vijlder shows how the state remains the “balance sheet of last resort” in the event of an economic crisis. He also reviews the current situation of public finances and what this implies in terms of dynamics of the  debt/GDP ratio.
The Covid-19 pandemic: stress testing the supply side 4/17/2020
The Covid-19 pandemic shows that the supply side warrants greater attention when conducting macroeconomic analyses. Very long global value chains may be optimal from a cost and price perspective, but operationally may be very complex and, in particular, fragile. A more resilient supply side comes with a cost, both at the micro and macro level. Solving this trade-off in a market economy is difficult, which, to some degree, leaves a role for public policy.
Huge jump in uncertainty acts as an additional drag on activity 4/17/2020
The Covid-19 pandemic has caused a jump in most of our uncertainty indicators. The media coverage based indicator is now at a record high. After stabilising at a high level, uncertainty of German companies has increased further whereas it has seen a big jump for US businesses. The behaviour of geopolitical risk is an exception...
Will the Covid-19 shock lead to a significant increase in the inflation rate ? 4/17/2020
There is no doubt that the Covid pandemic will lead to a short but deep world recession. However, the effect on inflation is unclear. If in the short term, many observers expect disinflationary bias, the medium-term inflation outlook is more ambiguous.
Hospital capacity and ageing populations 4/15/2020
Over the past decennia, hospital capacity has been gradually reduced in most OECD countries, as major health care innovations have resulted in a gradual shift towards more extra-muros care. Nevertheless, countries with the oldest populations such as Japan and Germany have maintained a large hospital capacity. In Germany, the number of acute beds is two to three times larger than in some other major countries such as France, the UK, and Italy. In that respect, South Korea is an outlier by combining a large hospital capacity with a relatively young population. In the current Covid-19 outbreak, having a large hospital capacity is a clear advantage. Fortunately, some countries have been able to increase their capacity of intensive care beds rapidly. Moreover, hospital capacity has been better used by transporting patients from overstretched regions to those with less Covid-19 patients. Thus, Germany has been able to receive French patients to relieve the hospitals in the eastern part of France. Hospital capacity is only one aspect of the current crisis. A country’s resistance to the virus is for an important part also determined by health care policies such as the availability of personal protective equipment, testing capacity and universal access to the health system.
COVID-19: Key measures taken by governments and central banks 4/15/2020
Major economic policy responses have been introduced to try to attenuate the impact of the Covid-19 pandemic on the economy. This document reviews the key measures taken by central banks and governments in a large number of countries as well as those taken by international organisations. It includes measures that were introduced through 10 April. It will be updated regularly.
COVID-19: Key measures taken by governments and central banks 4/9/2020
Major economic policy responses have been introduced to try to attenuate the impact of the Covid-19 pandemic on the economy. This document reviews the key measures taken by central banks and governments in a large number of countries as well as those taken by international organisations. It includes measures that were introduced through 3 April. It will be updated regularly.

ABOUT US Three teams of economists (OECD countries research, emerging economies and country risk, banking economics) make up BNP Paribas Economic Research Department.
This website presents their analyses.
The website contains 2422 articles and 621 videos