Since 2020, households’ real estate purchasing capacity has improved significantly in the tightest housing markets[1]. Our metric, which monitors changes in the amount of space a typical household[2] can purchase, has increased by almost 20% in areas where demand for housing significantly outstrips supply (A bis). In contrast, in less constrained or even unconstrained areas, purchasing capacity decreased during the same period (by -0.8%, -6.9% and -6.1% in areas B1, B2 and C, respectively).
HOUSEHOLDS’ REAL ESTATE PURCHASING CAPACITY HAS IMPROVED SIGNIFICANTLY IN THE TIGHTEST HOUSING MARKETSThis seemingly contradictory finding can be explained by the relatively low real estate purchasing capacity in 2020 in the tightest markets. In 2015, these geographical areas (A, A bis) already had price-to-income ratios significantly above the national average. The subsequent surge in prices exacerbated the decline in households’ solvency until the health crisis. This crisis seems to have marked a distinct shift in the hierarchy of price trends:
- Between 2020 and 2022, the tightest housing markets (A bis) were characterised by virtually stagnant prices (from a high level), while prices continued to rise significantly in other areas. Consequently, buyers were able to fully capitalise on the impact of their nominal income increases on their purchasing capacity.
- Between Q3 2022 and Q1 2024, the increase in lending costs for house purchase was accompanied by a more pronounced drop in housing prices in areas where demand outstrips supply: -13% in zone A bis, compared with -7% in zone B1, -4% in zone B2 and -5% in zone C.
- Since Q2 2024, prices have shown relative stability across all zoning categories.
These developments indicate that households’ real estate purchasing capacity reached a critical threshold in 2020 in areas with the tightest housing markets. As income[3] and the cost of credit are changing in a relatively homogeneous manner[4] at the national level, it is mainly price dynamics that account for the differences observed between areas. In the tightest housing markets, the stagnation and then decline in prices have therefore had a positive impact: they have facilitated a recovery in real estate purchasing capacity and has given new impetus to transaction volumes.