The possibility of a US recession triggered by monetary tightening is looking less and less likely given the resilience of an economy that continued to grow by 0.8% q/q in Q4 2023 and by 2.5% on average over the year. Our central scenario is now that of a marked slowdown albeit without an economic recession in H1 2024. The Federal Reserve can now look forward to a soft landing and consider rate cuts in 2024 – a year in which political events will take centre stage.
On the margins of discussions about banking regulation and supervision, the role played by the Federal Home Loan Banks (FHLB) prior to the bank run in Spring 2023 is bitterly disputed. Seeking to correct the distortions resulting from their status and refocus the FHLBs on their main mission, their regulator, the Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA), has proposed several areas of reform.However, limiting the FHLBs’ capacity to support bank liquidity could have significant effects on the money markets and structurally increase banks’ requirements for central bank money.
The ISM Report on Business showed an improvement in non-manufacturing activity in the United States in November, with the corresponding index rising to 52.7 (+0.9pp). Conversely, the ISM Manufacturing index was stable (46.7), as the improvement in new orders was offset by a deterioration in production and employment. This result is consistent with our forecast of a slowdown in the US economy in Q4, with the GDP growth rate edging down to +0.4% q/q according to our forecast (versus +0.6% for the Atlanta Fed’s GDPNow estimate, and +1.3% in Q3). However, the prospect of a recession is gradually receding, and we now expect a single quarter of contraction in 2024 (-0.3% q/q in Q2, with Q1 expected to be flat).
The latest communication from the Federal Reserve -the new projections of the FOMC members for the federal funds rate and the comments of Fed Chair Powell during his press conference- reinforce the view that the US economy should experience a soft landing, which should allay potential worries about the outlook for corporate cash flows and household income. Bond and equity prices rallied, reflecting a feeling amongst investors of ‘Santa Claus is coming to town’. The focus will now shift to the trickier part of the soft landing scenario: how fast and far will rates be cut? Another important question is when will bond markets start to anticipate the risk that the pick-up in growth that should follow from further disinflation and lower interest rates would quickly lead to new bottlenecks.
The net short position of hedge funds in the US Treasury futures market has expanded considerably over the course of the year. At the end of November, it stood at an unprecedented level of almost USD 800 billion. Asset managers, eager to hedge against interest-rate risk, increased their net long positions.
The FHFA recently proposed reforming the Federal Home Loan Banks, which are accused of having taken on the role of lender of next-to-last resort, a role that was much too big for them.
According to the initial estimate by the BEA (Bureau of Economic Analysis), the United States economy gathered significant pace in Q3, with GDP growth up +1.2% q/q (+0.7pp). This advance, the largest in seven quarters, was driven by strong household consumption (+1.0% q/q), alongside with a significant contribution of stocks (adding +0.3pp to the rate of growth). Conversely, non-residential investment stalled, following two buoyant quarters, under the combined impact of the monetary tightening and the fading of the impulse priorly provided by the IRA and the CHIPS Act.
Last October, an average of over USD 1,500 bn was traded daily on the Treasuries repo markets through the Fixed Income Clearing Corporation (FICC), USD 500 bn more than in October 2022. While transactions between FICC clearing members remained relatively stable, sponsored repo loans rose sharply.
The significant rise in American households’ mortgage rates prompted a depletion of housing inventories on the existing real estate market. This “freezing” situation on the existing home segment enabled some demand redirection towards newly built houses.
Rather than slowing down, which is what one would expect considering the cumulative tightening of monetary policy, US growth has been stellar in the third quarter. Household consumption has been a key contributor to this performance but public spending, inventory rebuilding and a rebound in residential construction have also underpinned growth. It is to be expected that growth will slow down going forward. High mortgage rates will weigh on construction activity, there is a risk that companies will prefer to reduce their inventories if they expect softer demand and there are limits to how far households will want to reduce their savings rate and run down their excess savings accumulated during the pandemic.
Business climate has marginally weakened in September in the United States due to diverging developments in the Manufacturing and Non-Manufacturing sectors. The latter has slowed to 53.6 (-0.9pp) in the ISM survey, torn between a vigorous activity (‘Business Activity’ component standing at 58.8) and a large drop in ‘New Orders’ (51.8, -6.7pp). On the other hand, the ISM Manufacturing index rose for a third month in a row and reached 49.0 (+1.4pp), thereby reaching a 10-month high despite remaining in the contraction area.
The US economy keeps growing and postponing the occurrence of a recession that is still likely, but not in 2023 and in a circumscribed way. While households’ consumption has so far proven resilient to the monetary tightening, the delayed and cumulative effects should eventually impulse a recessionary dynamic. The first fallout is already visible on the real estate market and the labour market has exhibited signs of easing. If rate hikes are probably over, the restrictive stance is not.
US Treasury yields have increased significantly since the end of July and this movement has accelerated in the past three weeks. It seems that the increase in the term premium has been a key driver although there is ambiguity about the underlying causes. There is no ambiguity however on the economic consequences: they are negative. A key channel of transmission is the housing market. Credit demand in general should suffer and another factor to monitor is the equity market considering that the earnings yield of the S&P500 is now lower than 10-year Treasury yields. All these factors represent a headwind to growth and may convince the FOMC that an additional rate hike before the end of the year is not warranted
In the world of central banking, nothing is what it seems. The ECB’s recent rate hike was considered dovish whereas the pause by the Federal Reserve received the label hawkish. These reactions show that, beyond the rate decision, the accompanying message also matters. That of the ECB was interpreted as signaling that the terminal rate had been reached. In the US, the latest rate projections of the FOMC members -the dot plot- point toward another hike before year end and a federal funds rate that would stay elevated for longer. This is unsurprising given the resilience of the US economy in reaction to the aggressive monetary tightening and the concern that bringing inflation back to the 2% target would take more time
The United States has observed an improvement in the business climate in August, which should postpone the risk of recession for a few more months. The ISM Manufacturing rose by 1.2 pp and reached 47.6. However, the index has been well in contraction territory since November 2022, the longest period since the GFC.
Jerome Powell’s opening remarks at the US Federal Reserve Symposium in Jackson Hole were at the center of attention and focused on the short term and inflation. What is the main takeaway? The fight against inflation is not yet over – a message echoed and supported by Christine Lagarde in her own address.
Although in May, the business climate might well have suggested a future recession, in June, things looked less clear. Admittedly, the further drop in the manufacturing ISM, to 46 in June, brought it to its lowest level since the 2008 crisis (excluding the Covid period). However, the message conveyed by the non-manufacturing ISM was noticeably different, with a rebound to 53.9 in June, compared to 50.3 in May.
On average, over the past year, US money market funds (MMFs) have “deposited” almost USD 2,200bn in cash with the Federal Reserve (Fed) every day in exchange for the overnight reverse repurchase of Treasury securities held on the Fed’s balance sheet (Overnight Reverse Repo Facility, ON RRP). In recent months, these “deposits” have fallen sharply. On 17 July, they stood at «only» USD 1,730 bn.
The US economy continues to grow and create jobs, albeit at a gradually slower pace, and the Federal Reserve has not quite finished with rate hikes. We continue to anticipate a recession, from Q3 2023 until Q1 2024, under the effect of monetary tightening. Having opted for the status quo in June on the back of inflation continuing to fall and in order to take time to assess the effects of the monetary tightening implemented to date, the Fed is expected to make a final 25 bps increase in July, bringing the Fed funds range to 5.25-5.50%.
The interest rate projections (‘dots’) of the FOMC members represent a reference point that can help investors and economic agents in general in forming their own interest rate expectations This can be particularly welcome when the monetary environment is changing swiftly like has been the case over the past two years. To explore this, a comparison has been made between the federal funds rate projections of the Survey of Market Participants (SMP) and those of the FOMC members. It seems that the dots may play a role in anchoring long-term interest rate expectations. The private sector forecasts closely follow the dots for 2023 and to a lesser extent for 2024, beyond which they are essentially stable. This is important considering that it might influence the pricing of bonds
According to the Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta's GDPNow estimate, US growth stands at +0.5% q/q in Q2 2023, a figure slightly higher than our forecast (+0.4% q/q) and slightly better than Q1 (+0.3% q/q). As Q1 growth was largely driven downwards by the negative contribution of inventories (-0.5 pp), we can expect a more favourable development in Q2. Although a further decline in residential investment is hardly in doubt (it would be the 9th in a row), the resistance of household consumption and non residential investment will be closely scrutinised.
With the return of elevated inflation, the debate on the output cost of bringing down inflation that was very lively in the early 80s has made a comeback. This debate is centered around the sacrifice ratio -the loss in output compared to its trend level for a given decline in inflation- and whether the landing of the economy will be hard or soft. Recently, the semantics have evolved and commentators now speak of the possibility of immaculate disinflation, whereby inflation is brought back to target by the Fed through a restrictive monetary policy but with a very small cost in terms of unemployment. For this to happen, labour tensions should ease and lead to a drop in wage growth. This will take time. In addition, the US economy should do a better job in filling vacancies
According to the latest data, inflation in both the euro area and the US is mainly driven by its core component and thus, at first glance, by demand. Supply factors are also at work through the spillover effects of the shock on energy and commodity prices and food inflation. These first-round effects show first signs of fading, which should pull inflation down more sharply in the coming months. Wage dynamics are closely monitored given their inflationary nature, which is modest but persistent, justifying the monetary response.
In the first quarter of 2023, US growth was +0.3% q/q. This is well below expectations: the figure is half the GDPNow estimate of the Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta and our forecast (0.6%). Growth appears then not to be so impervious to the inflationary shock and the monetary tightening implemented to cope with it.
In his latest press conference, Federal Reserve Chair Powell argued that monetary policy might already be sufficiently restrictive. In future decisions, economic data will be particularly important but this does not imply that the latest data are the only thing that matters. The delayed effects of past rate hikes need to be taken into account, considering that they will only show up in the data published over the following months. This is why in past tightening cycles, the Fed has tended to stop hiking rates although the pace of job creation was still rather healthy and well before the unemployment rate picked up significantly
