Following the judgment of the German Constitutional Court on 5 May, the ECB Governing Council needs to demonstrate that the monetary policy objectives of its PSPP are not disproportionate to the economic and fiscal policy effects resulting from the programme. In most cases, monetary, economic and fiscal policies are mutually reinforcing. When assessing whether monetary policy is appropriate, one should take into account the stance of economic and fiscal policy. The necessity to have adequate transmission to all jurisdictions as well as the likelihood and extent of tail risks due to insufficient policy action also play a role in the assessment.
Lending momentum in the euro zone recovered strongly in March 2020, with an increase of 1.6% from a 0.4% fall in February. Against a background of negative GDP growth in the first quarter (-3.3% Q/Q-4 from +1.0% Q/Q-4 the fourth quarter of 2019), conditions in March were severely affected by the lockdown measures introduced by national governments over the month [...]
The Covid-19 crisis will result in a sharp contraction of eurozone GDP. However, its effect on inflation is still unclear. The impact could be disinflationary over the short term, although no consensus has emerged as to the likely medium term trend. In March, total inflation in the eurozone fell significantly, also reflecting the effect of lower energy prices. The destruction of a portion of the productive capacity could constrain supply in the medium term, whilst public policies will support demand, thus encouraging an acceleration in prices. Conversely, a lack of demand relative to potential supply could maintain a disinflationary bias in the eurozone.
The Covid-19 pandemic has triggered a recession in the Eurozone that looks likely to be deep but short-lived. After a difficult year and a half on the economic front, the Eurozone was showing some resilience and was even beginning to show signs of stabilisation. The current shock – in demand, supply and uncertainty simultaneously – has completely changed the outlook. The health measures taken- which have been necessary to protect the population from the virus- have created the conditions for a recession. Monetary and fiscal policymakers have reacted swiftly and, so far, proportionately. However, the profile of the economic recovery remains unclear and will be crucial in assessing the damage ultimately caused by the pandemic.
Looking at the economic data for the euro area that has emerged recently, the conclusion is clear: we are seeing an unprecedented economic contraction in the service sector. The average eurozone service sector PMI plummeted in Q1 2020, well below its long-term average...
Purchasing Managers Index (PMI) for March showed a significant deterioration in the Eurozone. Having not really shown up in the data before, the shock from Covid-19 would be the biggest since the 2008-2009 crisis. Many countries will be affected and economic policy will need to continue to play its full role in ensuring that we come out of the crisis on a solid footing.
The ECB announced a new series of measures to counter the economic consequences of the Coronavirus pandemic. The Governing Council is seeking to maximize the impact of its actions by opting for targeted measures. It is paying special attention to the risk that monetary and financial conditions could tighten. Despite communication missteps, the ECB has expressed its determination and has called on governments to take concerted action.
Credit impulse in the euro zone stabilised in December 2019 (up 0.3%, as in November) against a background of a slight slowing of real GDP growth in the fourth quarter (1.0% from 1.2% in the third quarter). Outstanding bank lending to the private sector maintained its pace of growth in December (up 3.7% year-on-year). For the second month in a row, growth in lending to NFCs was less than that in lending to consumers. The slowdown in growth in lending to NFCs (where the year-on-year figure fell from 3.8% in October to 3.2% in December) was due mainly to lower investment spending (in France, Germany and most particularly Spain). This was in part offset by strong growth in consumer loans (from 3.5% to 3.7%)
Will the year 2020 be marked by a rebound in eurozone economic growth? More favourable signs seem to be emerging, although they have yet to show up clearly in hard data. In any case, eurozone growth is bound to remain low. In this environment, inflationary pressures will probably fall short of the central bank’s target. Beyond that, the ECB Governing Council will be tackling new issues in 2020. Christine Lagarde announced a strategic review for the Frankfurt-based monetary institution. On the agenda: cryptocurrencies, climate change, technological progress, and inequalities.
The ECB remains cautious in its assessment of the economic situation characterised by risks still tilted to the downside, although less than before thanks to the US-China trade deal. The message is slightly better on underlying inflation where some signs of a moderate increase are noted. Between now and year-end, the strategy review, which has now been launched, will grab a lot of attention, with markets wondering how it could influence monetary policy. The review is also important from the perspective of climate change: will monetary policy operations take it on board as a risk factor or will ambition even be higher?
The most recent economic data in the Eurozone send an encouraging signal. The economic situation remains subdued, and particularly in the manufacturing and export sector, but a start of stabilisation can be expected...
After picking up in October, the credit pulse of non-financial corporates (NFC) in the eurozone dipped again in November. Yet the decline in the private sector’s credit pulse was still very mild, bolstered by the remarkable stability of the credit pulse for households. Recent trends should extend into first-quarter 2020: the banks surveyed expect loan demand from NFC to continue to ease. Inversely, exceptionally low interest rates should continue to boost loan demand from households, mainly for home loans.
Danish monetary policy is closely linked to ECB policy so the recent statement of Denmark’s central bank governor that he expects interest rates to remain around current negative levels in the next five to ten years is not without importance for the eurozone. Forward guidance by ECB implies that policy will only be adjusted when justified by economic conditions. The inability to be clearer in terms of time frame illustrates the complexities of inflation dynamics. Past wage increases will gradually filter through in a pick-up in inflation although low inflation, well-anchored inflation expectations and intense competition in certain sectors may very well moderate this transmission. It thus seems clear that the current policy will remain in place for a considerable time
Eurozone GDP growth is causing concern, but the relative resilience of employment continues to surprise. This trend is nothing new. The negative impact on employment of previous crises has been fairly restrained. Despite considerable difficulties in the sector, manufacturing employment is holding up particularly well. The slowdown in productivity gains could, in the short term at least, help drive the growth in jobs. Slower growth in hours worked and low-skilled jobs: a possible labour hoarding phenomenon is under way in Eurozone companies.
The slowdown in economic activity in the Eurozone and inflation structurally below the target rate have raised the spectre of “Japanification”. This would mean effective growth running below potential, very low interest rates and negative inflation. In Japan, this combination of factors resulted from the bursting of the financial and real estate bubbles of the early 1990s. There is a range of factors that could cause “Japanification”. Faced with the challenges of an ageing population and slowing productivity gains, the Eurozone will need to focus its efforts on boosting its potential growth and its resilience to shocks. Short- and medium-term economic policy choices will therefore be crucial in limiting, as far as possible, the risk of “Japanification”.
The ECB’s monetary policy meeting account illustrates the dilemma it is facing: inflation is subdued and risks to growth are tilted to the downside, yet the financial stability implications of the very accommodative policy need to be closely monitored. These implications are covered in sobering detail in the ECB’s Financial Stability Review. A possible side effect of very low to negative interest rates is that borrowing and spending become more procyclical. Quantitative easing (QE), by modifying the risk structure of investment portfolios (less government bonds and more exposure to assets with a higher risk), will probably increase the sensitivity of portfolio returns to the business cycle.
While many observers have been worried since several months about the health of the manufacturing sector, the activity in services still shows resilience and keeps growing at a pretty decent pace. Nevertheless, the latest economic indicators send a less favourable signal. The Purchasing Managers Index (PMI) for the services sector indeed decreased in November to 51.5 (against 52.2 in October). This level is quite low regarding the historical average. The outlook for economic growth in the coming months, by and large, depends on the resilience of the labour market and the ability to create new jobs.
Automatic fiscal stabilisers help cushion the impact of economic shocks on GDP via changes in government revenues (because of progressive taxes) and expenditures (unemployment insurance). The limited remaining monetary policy leeway in the eurozone is fueling interest in the effectiveness of the automatic stabilisers. European Commission research confirms that, to some degree, automatic stabilisers iron out the impact of negative shocks on GDP. Whether that is enough is another matter. It warrants a debate on the role of discretionary fiscal policy in case of a recession.
The credit impulse has declined in September, moderately for households and much more noticeably for non-financial corporations (NFC). For the latter, the credit impulse has hit its lowest level since the beginning of the asset purchases programme by the ECB at the start of 2015. These movements contrast with the stability of GDP growth in the third quarter in the Eurozone (with a year-on-year rate of 1.2%, like in the second quarter). They almost exclusively involve loans with a maturity of less than one year, which is mainly related to destocking behaviour. For the fourth quarter of 2019, banks interrogated by the ECB anticipate a continued moderation of demand by NFCs and an intensification of demand for housing loans by households.
GDP growth in Q3 2019 has beaten expectations. The growth rate stabilised at +0.2% (q/q) compared to the previous quarter. Economic growth is stable in Spain (+0.4%), in France (+0.3%) and in Italy (+0.1%). For Germany, the data are not published yet. The activity in the manufacturing sector remains subdued while in October, the purchasing managers index (PMI) in the services sector is well below its long term average. Over the coming months, the risk of negative spillovers from manufacturing to services needs to be closely monitored. The evolution of the unemployment rate, which on a historical basis is still relatively low, will be a key factor in the short term.
