When questions have been answered, new ones pop up, reflecting a shift in focus. We are again experiencing this phenomenon. Recent comments by Christine Lagarde and Jerome Powell have provided implicit guidance on the timing of the first rate cut. The focus is now shifting to how fast and how far policy rates will be reduced
Recent communication by the Federal Reserve and the ECB has made it clear that the first cut in official interest rates is coming. Both central banks are saying the same -it depends on the data- but the ECB communication is more opaque than that of the Federal Reserve, which provides interest rate projections of the FOMC members (dot plot). In assessing how fast and how much the ECB might cut policy rates in this cycle, several approaches can be adopted. Based on the credibility of the ECB and plausible estimates of the neutral rate, it makes sense to use an assumption of a range between 2.00% and 2.50% for the ECB deposit rate as the end point of the easing cycle.
GDP growth, inflation, exchange and interest rates.
Key figures for the French economy compared with those of the main European countries, analysis of data on the population and the French labour market, activity by sector, publication administration figures, inflation, credit and interest rates, corporate and household accounts.
In the US, the latest Survey of Professional Forecasters (SPF) of the Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia paints a rather upbeat picture of the economic outlook. A similar survey of the ECB points towards a gradual pickup in growth this year. In both cases, the level of disagreement is low. This provides reasons to be hopeful about the economic outlook. However, the alternative scenarios are predominantly negative for growth and inflation, and some have totally different implications for the evolution of bond yields. This would mean that as time goes by and the likelihood of the different alternative scenarios evolves, bond yield volatility could be high.
In the United States, economic policy uncertainty, based on media coverage, fell significantly in February, following a rebound in January. The index fell from 124 to 97, the lowest level since July 2023, when the policy rates were last raised. With US growth and the labour market continuing to hold up well, the economic outlook appears to be brighter and less uncertain. This gives greater credit to the scenario of a soft landing for the economy, and greater comfort for the Fed’s cautious stance and to take its time before cutting rates.
In February, the S&P Global Composite PMI improved for the fourth consecutive month (+0.3 points), to 52.1, its highest level since June 2023. This is a fairly clearly encouraging signal for Q1 global growth, especially as this improvement is being driven both by the manufacturing and services sectors. In February, the global PMI index in these two sectors reached its highest level since August 2022 and July 2023, at 50.3 and 52.4 respectively.
GDP growth, inflation, interest and exchange rates.
The economic situation in January and February highlights the uncertainties surrounding 2024 with, on the positive side, improvements in the business climate in several countries and resilient labour markets (Europe) or labour markets remaining dynamic (US). Combined with a disinflation trajectory not yet spreading to all sectors (services in particular), all these factors are tending to defer expectations of rate cuts.
Global maritime freight stabilised in February after the previous month’s sharp rise following the escalation of tensions in the Red Sea. The Freightos index is currently stable, with a decline even observed on routes between China and Europe which had been most directly affected by the conflict in the Middle East and by the rise in transport costs. The New York Federal Reserve’s global supply chain pressure index was unchanged in January but is expected to rise again in February, reflecting longer delivery times in the PMIs.
After a short respite in December, uncertainty about US economic policy, based on media coverage, rose again in January. This resurgence in uncertainty was likely caused by the latest US inflation figures, which proved more persistent than expected: it remained above 3% in January (3.1% year-on-year, according to the BLS Consumer Price Index) and turned out to be higher than consensus expectations (2.9%). During its mid-December meeting, the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) made it clear that it would not be appropriate to cut rates in the absence of certainty as to whether inflation was on a sustainable downward path towards its 2% target.
The global composite PMI rose for the third consecutive month in January (up to 51.8 from 51 in December), reaching its highest level since June 2023. All sectors have contributed to this improvement in global activity. In January, the global manufacturing and services PMIs hit their highest levels since August 2022 and July 2023, respectively.
GDP growth, inflation, interest and exchange rates
2023 closed on a note of hope, with expectations of rate cuts and signs of stabilising, perhaps even improving confidence surveys. This hope has not dissipated in the early weeks of 2024. In the absence of a new shock, inflation seems to be on course for a return to the 2% target. This opens the way to the first steps in monetary easing, expected in the second quarter. These twin falls, in inflation and interest rates, and the encouraging pattern in the bulk of the economic data, fuel the expectations of a soft-landing scenario. But this is not to say that there are no risks or points worthy of continued attention. Geopolitical tensions remain high and capable of disrupting this scenario, most notably through their inflationary effects
The narrative of the last mile of disinflation being the hardest, which in 2023 became popular in the world of central banking, reflects concern that after having dropped significantly, further declines in inflation would be more difficult.However, it seems that relevance of this narrative is increasingly being questioned. The account of the December 2023 meeting of the ECB governing council mentions that it has been debated. It seemed that the disinflation of 2023 had been faster than in previous episodes, raising doubts about the relevance of the narrative. A paper of the Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta analyses this topic for the US. Based on recent research on the Phillips curve, it concludes that the ‘last mile’ is likely not significantly more arduous than the rest
The Red Sea conflict has already had a substantial impact on global shipping. While maritime freight prices are, at this stage, still well below the levels seen in 2021, when the global economy was recovering post-lockdown, they have spiked in January 2024. The Freightos index (chart 5) shows that transportation costs have tripled on average compared to the end of last year. Due to their geographical locations, China and Europe have been the regions most directly affected by these disruptions, and are already facing threefold (China-Europe route) to fivefold (Europe-China route) increases in transportation costs. However, the effects are gradually being felt on all global shipping routes
BNP Paribas Economic Research wishes you all the best for 2024. On the macroeconomic front, the highlight of 2023 was the peak in official rates in the United States and the eurozone, but what is in store for 2024?In this video, you can discover the topics and points of attention that will be monitored throughout 2024 for each team: Banking Economy, OECD and Country Risk.
In recent speeches and interviews, officials of the Federal Reserve and the ECB have cooled down market enthusiasm about the timing and number of rate cuts this year. In the US, the message is that there is no reason to move as quickly or cut as rapidly as in the past, considering the healthy state of the economy. In the Eurozone, despite the drop in inflation in 2023, there is still uncertainty about the inflation outlook, particularly due to the pace of wage growth. Moreover, there is also a concern that the easing of financial conditions -due to overly optimistic market assumptions about the policy rate path- would be counterproductive from a monetary policy perspective. Both the Federal Reserve and the ECB want to tread carefully in deciding when to start cutting rates
