In 2020, the budget deficit was mostly financed by drawing on deposits of the government and public enterprises. Then in mid-2021, the central bank implemented a special 12-month refinancing program for both the Treasury and state-owned banks that amounted to 9.8% of GDP. The goal was to meet the state budget funding needs and to improve the lending capacity of banks. In counterpart of debt repurchases of public enterprise in difficulties by the Treasury, state-owned banks involved in the program have invested most of their funds obtained from the central bank in long-term treasuries issued below market rates. Further direct or indirect debt monetization should not be necessary in the short term. However, these operations have resulted in transferring the credit risk supported by public banks to the Treasury, even if the latter has benefited from financing cost at below market rates.
Algeria will be the sole hydrocarbon producer (along with Bahrain and Iran) in the MENA region not to rebalance its fiscal accounts in 2022-23, pointing to the structural weakness of public finances.
Unlike regional peers, spending will increase markedly in 2022 due to the acceleration in public investment program (+27% according to the financing bill) and the heavy cost of social transfers (estimated at 12-15% of GDP when the implicit oil subsidy is included). Moreover, most of fiscal consolidation measures introduced in the budget have been abandoned less than two months after their promulgation. Increases in taxes on several consumer goods and the implementation of new levies have been frozen. Above all, the deep reform of the subsidy system does not look in the pipe for the moment.
Fiscal consolidation is a long-term process requiring gradual but sustained efforts. Once again, the fiscal policy stance is highly pro-cyclical, which does not help to put the economy in a better position to cope with future oil shocks. Non-oil fiscal balance should widen in 2022 relative to that of 2021 and 2019, keeping again Algeria into a weak position compared with its regional peers (chart 11).
The central government’s debt will decrease slightly but remain high at about 60% of GDP in 2022-23 against 9% in 2014. The situation is manageable in the short term. The central government’s debt is fundamentally captive. It is almost entirely owed by the central bank and local banks (chart 12) and has long-term maturities and very low cost (interest burden is below 1% of GDP) thanks to successive direct and indirect debt monetization programs. However, such a financing strategy is not sustainable should large budget deficits reappear. Fortunately, recourse to external borrowing seems still to be excluded despite some signs of greater openness, which means that external debt will remain negligible.