It has demonstrated that inflation-targeting central banks are risk averse: they can’t afford a big slowdown, otherwise it would jeopardise the odds of reaching their objective. Financial markets have understood this monetary put option all too well and the performance of equities has been genuinely amazing. Against a background of slowing global growth, a dimmed profits outlook and pervasive uncertainty, they have climbed the proverbial wall of worries. With interest rates stuck at a very low level, it implies, going forward, a high degree of sensitivity to the growth outlook.
Another reassuring development has been the acknowledgment that monetary policy has virtually reached the end of the road. It is reassuring because it forces a re-think of how to fight economic downturns. Mario Draghi made a rallying cry on the occasion of the September meeting of the ECB Governing Council for fiscal policy to step in so as to boost growth and enhance the effectiveness of monetary policy in reaching its target.
The Federal Reserve’s strategic review of the objectives, tools and communication of its monetary policy has to be seen in the same light. The results are eagerly awaited in the first semester of next year and will fuel speculation about the outcome of a similar exercise at the ECB, where, quoting Christine Lagarde, “no stone will be left unturned”. This review will take place against a background of increased concern about the unintended consequences of a prolonged period of negative interest rates. In this respect, the Swedish central bank took the interesting decision this week of hiking its policy rate and bringing it back to zero, despite a slowing economy, on the grounds that negative interest rates may end up having net negative effects.
One area of particular debate in the Eurosystem will be the role of the central bank in the context of the climate change challenge. ECB President Lagarde said during her confirmation hearing, that she was ready to make aggressive strides toward environmental objectives. In the ECB’s governing council, opinions are divided as many fear that the ECB might enter a political minefield. Concerns about the environment have increased in 2019, as CO2 emissions are still rising and the earth is still on a high emission path. The increased frequency of natural disasters (heatwaves and flooding in Europe, wild fires in the Brazil Amazon region, California and Australia) may be a warning of the things to come. Environmental considerations are increasingly taken into account in policy decisions. Recently, the EU has taken some major initiatives such as the adoption of a taxonomy for sustainable activities (which is essential for formulating climate policy to avoid green washing) and the announcement by the European Commission of the Green Deal to make the EU carbon neutral by 2050. These initiatives were most welcome considering the important setbacks in 2019. The COP25 was a failure as countries could not agree on rules for an international carbon market and President Trump confirmed that the United States will formally pull out of the Paris agreement on 4 November 2020, one day after the upcoming US presidential election. It makes next year’s COP26 from 9-19 November in Glasgow crucially important. This reminds us that many developments of 2019 will influence the turn of events in 2020. Central bank policy rates are stuck at a (very) low level, uncertainty may have declined a bit but trade tensions and hard Brexit concerns haven’t disappeared. However, recent survey data provided some hope that in 2020 growth could actually surprise to the upside. It is what we wish to all of our readers.
