Eco Perspectives

Indonesia | Robust growth but deteriorating governance

07/20/2026
PDF

Indonesia is facing two external shocks: rising energy prices and capital outflows. The decline in governance quality has indeed impacted foreign investor confidence. Assuming that the conflict in the Middle East subsides, pressures on external accounts and energy subsidy costs are expected to ease. However, oil prices are expected to remain consistently above their early-2026 levels, perpetuating the risk of fiscal slippage. Investors remain cautious, and rupiah volatility is high.

Strong Growth

Forecast

In Q1 2026, real GDP growth accelerated sharply to 5.6% y/y, a rate not seen since 2012 (excluding the post-pandemic rebound). The main driver was household consumption, bolstered by wage increases and distribution of free meals. Activity was also bolstered by increased government spending and accelerated investment, supported by an accommodative monetary policy.

The growth outlook for 2026 remains positive. Real GDP growth is expected to remain robust at 5%, although it is expected to fall short of the government’s 5.4% target, partly due to rising real interest rates impacting investment decisions.

Consumer Price Inflation still under control

Inflationary pressures remain limited so far

To mitigate the impact of the energy shock caused by the conflict in the Middle East on households, the government has kept petrol prices unchanged for all fuels except Pertaminax, which saw its price double but accounts for only 7% of petrol consumption. Consumer price inflation has so far remained manageable (+3.3% y/y in June). However, producer price increases (+6.5% y/y in June) will gradually feed through to consumer prices (Chart 1).

Despite inflation remaining within the target range (+2.5% ±1pp), the central bank has raised its policy rate twice since the conflict began, primarily to counter downward pressure on the rupiah (+75bps to 5.75%).

Increasing Risk of Fiscal Slippage

For two decades, Indonesia has managed to maintain its fiscal deficit at 3% of GDP (excluding the pandemic period) while keeping public debt at a reasonable level, despite modest revenue. However, since taking office in October 2024, the Prabowo government has implemented several budget adjustments that deviate from the conservative fiscal approach of the Widodo administration. This shift raises concerns about fiscal slippage, especially as public finances were already strained by the pandemic.

In 2025, the fiscal deficit increased by 0.6pp to 2.9% of GDP—an unprecedented level outside the pandemic period. In addition to the widening deficit, the sharp decline in revenue (-1.3pp) is concerning, as it fell to just 11.6% of GDP, the lowest among the ASEAN-6 countries. This situation highlights inefficiencies in the implementation of a centralised tax system and the allocation of state-owned enterprise dividends to the sovereign wealth fund Danantara (-0.4% of GDP). Furthermore, the postponement of the VAT hike (from 11% to 12%), which was initially proposed by the Widodo government for all consumer goods but was ultimately applied only to luxury items, has deprived the government of an estimated revenue boost of 0.3% of GDP. For 2026, the likelihood of the deficit exceeding the 3% of GDP threshold set by Parliament has increased due to rising energy subsidy costs, further exacerbated by the depreciation of the rupiah.

Over the first five months of the year, the fiscal deficit widened by 0.6% of GDP compared to the same period last year. Energy subsidies increased in tandem with oil prices, reaching 0.8% of GDP—the level initially projected for the entire year. The worsening fiscal deficit is also attributed to higher civil servant wages. To mitigate the deficit expansion, the government has cut other expenditures, particularly the budget allocated for the free meal distribution programme, which could see a reduction equivalent to 0.3% of GDP, bringing it down to 1% of GDP. But this may not be sufficient. Oil prices in H2 2026 are expected to remain consistently above early-2026 levels. Assuming an average price of USD 81.6 in H2 2026 (vs. USD 91.8 in H1 2026), annual energy subsidies could reach 1.6% of GDP.

Additionally, interest payments on government debt are set to rise further in 2026. They have steadily increased since 2023, reaching 2.2% of GDP in 2025 (or 19% of revenue, compared to 16.1% in Malaysia and 6% in Thailand). So far, the moderate increase in interest rates and a favourable debt structure (with long maturities and approximately 97% fixed-rate) have limited the growth in interest burden. However, bond yields—which have risen by 114bps between January and mid-July 2026—could continue to climb, further reducing the government’s fiscal room for manoeuvre.

As a result, the fiscal deficit could increase from an average of 2.3% of GDP over the past five years (excluding the pandemic) to 3% of GDP over the next five years. Government debt, which remains relatively low (40.5% of GDP at end-2025), could exceed 42% by 2028. While this level is still moderate, the risks are skewed to the upside. The debt-to-GDP ratio could rise further if the rupiah depreciates (as 29.5% of the debt is denominated in foreign currency. Above all, the main risk lies in the potential increase in debt refinancing costs, as Indonesia faces significant foreign investor distrust that currently hold 37.1% of the total government debt.

External Accounts under Pressure

External accounts have deteriorated

Indonesia ranks among the Southeast Asian countries least affected by the energy shock, alongside Malaysia, with a modest oil and gas trade deficit standing at 1.4% of GDP in 2025, compared with 3.6% in the Philippines and Vietnam, and 5.9% in Thailand. Nevertheless, between January and mid-July, the rupiah recorded one of its worst performances against the dollar (-7.3%), breaching the IDR 18,000/USD threshold in early June, a historically low level.

This downward trend, which began in mid-2025 and was exacerbated by the Middle East conflict, can be attributed to: i) a decline in the trade surplus, which fell by 73.8% y/y in the first five months of 2026, resulting in a current account deficit that widened to 1.1% of GDP in Q1 2026, compared to just 0.1% in 2025, and ii) heightened foreign investor distrust.

Foreign direct investment (FDI), which had already declined significantly in 2025 to just 1% of GDP, down from 1.8% over the previous five years, further decreased to only 0.3% of GDP (annualised) in Q1 2026. FDI is no longer sufficient to cover the current account deficit, making the country reliant on portfolio investment.

However, portfolio investment outflows have accelerated sharply. In the first five months of the year, foreign holdings of all market securities plummeted by 32.9%, now accounting for just 35.6% of total issued securities, marking the lowest level on record. The Jakarta stock index fell by over 32% between January and early June, representing the worst performance in Southeast Asia.

Two factors explain this loss of confidence in Indonesia, despite its robust growth and strong macroeconomic fundamentals: i) the government’s shift towards a less conservative fiscal policy, and ii) deteriorating governance quality.

Currently, foreign currency refinancing risk remains manageable. Although foreign exchange reserves have been declining since early 2026 (USD -12.3bn), they still cover 1.5 times the country’s external financing needs. However, the depreciation of the rupiah has led to an increase in the external debt-to-GDP ratio, which stands at a modest 29.5%, and exposes unhedged sectors, such as services and construction, to currency risk.

Since mid-June, the rupiah has experienced a temporary reprieve due to higher domestic interest rates and lower oil prices. However, the potential for further depreciation remains high, and the volatility of the rupiah is heightened. Additionally, while MSCI upheld Indonesia’s designation as an "emerging market" in June 2026, there is still a risk of being downgraded to a "frontier market" in the upcoming November review. Such a downgrade could trigger accelerated capital outflows and a lasting deterioration of the country’s external position.

Deteriorating Governance Quality

Since Prabowo Subianto took office, governance quality has declined. The mechanisms for oversight, transparency and conflict-of-interest prevention within the sovereign wealth fund Danantara are deemed insufficient by international standards. Furthermore, the government has increased interventions in the economy, notably by centralising exports of strategic commodities through Danantara—a move that is both protectionist and unpredictable, raising investor concerns about legal certainty and policy consistency. Furthermore, the independence of the central bank has been called into question following the appointment of the president’s nephew as its governor, amid increasing centralisation of economic decision-making by the executive.

Towards a Shift in Energy Strategy?

The Middle East crisis could prompt the Indonesian government to prioritise rapid energy self-sufficiency over ecological transition. While the economy is less oil-dependent than its regional counterparts (with oil accounting for less than 30% of its energy mix, compared to 47% in Thailand), it remains vital for the population, posing social and political risks. Consequently, the priority may shift towards reducing oil imports by expanding biodiesel (derived from palm oil) and, more crucially, increasing the use of domestic coal for electricity generation (particularly for electric vehicles). Indeed, Indonesia has abundant coal reserves.

Article completed on 10 July 2026

THE ECONOMISTS WHO PARTICIPATED IN THIS ARTICLE

Other articles from the same publication

Emerging Countries
Editorial | Emerging economies: why is the energy shock not derailing growth driven by the AI boom?

Editorial | Emerging economies: why is the energy shock not derailing growth driven by the AI boom?

Despite the war in Iran, the closure of the Strait of Hormuz and the temporary surge in energy prices, emerging economies have so far avoided a crisis scenario [...]

Read the article
Emerging Countries
Emerging countries | Consequences of the energy shock

Emerging countries | Consequences of the energy shock

The impact of the energy shock on the economic variables of emerging countries. [...]

Read the article
Emerging Countries
Main indicators

Main indicators

[...]

Read the article
Emerging Countries
Regional overviews up to 13 July 2026

Regional overviews up to 13 July 2026

Panoramas as of 13 July 2026: a severe shock with varying effects in the North Africa/Middle East region; heightened fragilities in Sub-Saharan Africa; Latin America less exposed to the energy shock; Asia with strengths to face the energy crisis. [...]

Read the article
China
China | Strengths and imbalances

China | Strengths and imbalances

China’s economic growth continues to be characterised by a significant disparity between the robust performance of the export sector and the fragility of sectors that rely on domestic demand [...]

Read the article
South Korea
South Korea | Between the energy shock and the AI boom, growth is finding a new balance

South Korea | Between the energy shock and the AI boom, growth is finding a new balance

South Korea is one of the countries most exposed to the global energy shock, yet it also reaps substantial benefits from soaring demand for artificial intelligence-related products [...]

Read the article
India
India | An economy better equipped than in 2022 to face the energy shock

India | An economy better equipped than in 2022 to face the energy shock

India is currently in a stronger position than it was in 2022 to cope with the new energy shock. The fiscal capacity to support the economy has increased, and inflation is more contained. Although a slowdown is anticipated (from 7 [...]

Read the article
Poland
Poland | Robust growth with no major imbalances aside from the public deficit

Poland | Robust growth with no major imbalances aside from the public deficit

Despite the energy shock, Poland’s economic growth is expected to remain robust and could even accelerate slightly in 2026 [...]

Read the article
Romania
Romania | Weakened by political instability

Romania | Weakened by political instability

Recent political tensions are once again drawing attention to Romania. The next government’s priority will be to further consolidate public finances; otherwise, the public debt-to-GDP ratio will continue to deteriorate [...]

Read the article
Türkiye
Türkiye | The economy will cope with renewed headwinds once again

Türkiye | The economy will cope with renewed headwinds once again

Turkish growth has slowed significantly since Q4 2025, and the oil shock since March has led to a significant erosion of foreign exchange reserves, a more pronounced depreciation in the lira than in other emerging-market currencies, and pressure on domestic bond yields. The risk of disruptions to hydrocarbon and fertilizer supplies is limited. However, the revision of official inflation forecasts, the subsequent tightening of monetary policy, and warnings of the finance minister about potential budget slippage have dampened investor sentiment, which is further unsettled by the AKP’s strategy of systematically sidelining potential rivals in the presidential elections. There are often recurring financial tensions in Türkiye. However, the risk of economic destabilization is low given the government’s moderate debt levels and the strength of the banking system. The slowdown is even beneficial, as it will help to limit the current account deficit and should help the central bank in curbing expectations of inflation and rebuilding its foreign exchange reserves. [...]

Read the article
Brazil
Brazil | The high cost of resilience

Brazil | The high cost of resilience

The Brazilian economy continues to withstand an ultra-restrictive monetary policy stance [...]

Read the article
Colombia
Colombia | A programme of radical change

Colombia | A programme of radical change

The presidential election on 21 June 2026 was won by Abelardo de la Espriella, an outsider who distances himself from the traditional figures of the Colombian right [...]

Read the article
Mexico
Mexico | USMCA review: Mexico’s industrial headache

Mexico | USMCA review: Mexico’s industrial headache

Mexico’s economic outlook remains modest. It is characterised by a slowdown in private consumption and investment still held back by uncertainty and a lack of new infrastructure projects [...]

Read the article
Saudi Arabia
Saudi Arabia | The conflict in the Middle East: more than just a temporary shock

Saudi Arabia | The conflict in the Middle East: more than just a temporary shock

Saudi Arabia may not be the Gulf economy most vulnerable to the conflict in Iran, but it is by no means unaffected. This year’s growth forecasts have been significantly downgraded due to the decline in oil production [...]

Read the article
Egypt
Egypt | Encouraging signs of macroeconomic recovery

Egypt | Encouraging signs of macroeconomic recovery

The impact of the war in Iran and the energy crisis on the Egyptian economy are currently limited. The economy has benefited from macroeconomic fundamentals strengthened by international support and the increased credibility of its economic policy [...]

Read the article