Our Pulse indicators leave a misleading negative impression. Indeed, with a 0.3% q/q print in Q3 2019 (first estimate), French growth continues to prove remarkably resilient and stable. And Q4 prospects look similarly positive judging by the October and November results of INSEE business confidence surveys and Markit PMIs. Admittedly, the composite indices were almost unchanged in November but they stand at a relatively high level (105 and 53, respectively). Besides, the headline figures mask more positive details, like, for instance, the improvement in the industry sector (whose confidence index, it is worth emphasizing, stands in the expansion zone contrary to Germany where it is in recession) and the rise in the employment and new export orders components.
The financial crisis of 2008 left its mark on the macroeconomic, regulatory and legal environments in the United Kingdom. It was followed by a long period of consolidation in the banking sector. Although the major British banks have managed to improve their performances recently, they are now faced with fresh challenges, starting with the uncertainty surrounding Brexit. For the banks, this uncertainty will not be resolved immediately by the conclusion of the Brexit as they will still need to adjust to the loss of their European passporting rights and potentially to address a contraction in demand in their domestic market.
Economic growth slowed to 6.0% y/y in Q3 2019 from 6.4% in Q4 2018. This is well under the annual average of 8% recorded over the past decade: the structural slowdown continues, aggravated since last year by the consequences of US protectionist measures on exports. Growth in private consumption has also decelerated, delaying the process of rebalancing of Chinese growth sources. Fiscal and monetary policy easing measures have been multiplied, and their impact on domestic demand should be visible in the last quarter of 2019.
Do fluctuations in uncertainty have a symmetric or asymmetric effect on the economy? The question is important considering that since last year, uncertainty has been acting as a headwind to global growth. Moreover, recent news about the US-China trade negotiations and Brexit have raised hope that uncertainty may have peaked and that growth in activity could accelerate. Empirical research shows that an increase in uncertainty has a bigger effect on the economy than a decline, in particular in a subdued growth environment. This would suggest that, should the decline in uncertainty be confirmed, the pick-up in growth would be very gradual.
In 2018, France remained an attractive place to invest, despite a tense social climate and an economic environment marked by the slowdown in European economy, Brexit and trade tensions between the United States and China. According to the EY barometer, France outperformed Germany and ranked right behind the UK in terms of the number of foreign investment projects. The industry, digital and services to corporate clients sectors attracted the greatest number of projects. France’s attractiveness highlights the resistance of its industrial network, the strength of its entrepreneurial ecosystem and the dynamism of its research. Recent reforms are also having a favourable impact. However, there is still room for progress in terms of taxation and labour costs.
GDP growth in Q3 2019 has beaten expectations. The growth rate stabilised at +0.2% (q/q) compared to the previous quarter. Economic growth is stable in Spain (+0.4%), in France (+0.3%) and in Italy (+0.1%). For Germany, the data are not published yet. The activity in the manufacturing sector remains subdued while in October, the purchasing managers index (PMI) in the services sector is well below its long term average. Over the coming months, the risk of negative spillovers from manufacturing to services needs to be closely monitored. The evolution of the unemployment rate, which on a historical basis is still relatively low, will be a key factor in the short term.
In the 2020 draft budget bill, the government is forecasting a deficit of 3.1% of GDP in 2019 and 2.2% in 2020 (after an observed deficit of 2.5% in 2018). The improvement in the 2020 deficit is misleading for the same reason as the widening of the 2019 deficit. Unlike the 2019 figures, 2020 no longer shows any traces of the one-off fiscal cost of the transformation of the CICE tax credit into reduced employers’ contributions. Excluding exceptional items, the fiscal deficit narrows by 0.1 point each year to 2.1% in 2020. The new 2020 deficit target is nearly a point higher than the one proposed last year in the 2019 draft budget bill. The wider deficit can be attributed in equal proportions to the downward revision of growth forecasts and structural adjustment
The US-China trade conflict and Brexit have been acting as a headwind for growth for a considerable time now. Recent developments have raised expectations that these sources of uncertainty may have peaked. Should it turn out to be the case, this could spur spending by unleashing pent-up demand by companies or households. However, in an environment of slowing global growth and, quoting the IMF, a precarious outlook for next year, we probably will see a more limited reaction, with other sources of concern taking over from the previous ones: uncertainty make have peaked in certain areas, but is likely to migrate to other.
After months of negative surprises, some indicators of the Pulse have migrated to the right hand side of the chart. In particular, the ifo business climate index stabilised in October, whereas the market had expected a further decline. Both ifo and pmi surveys signal a slight improvement in sentiment in manufacturing, although the indices remained deep in contraction territory. This is also confirmed by the continuing weakness of orders in August. Hence, the slight pick-up of industrial activity in that month was probably a statistical blip. The main risk for the economy is that the negative news feed from the export-oriented manufacturing sector is spreading to the domestic economy
